Re: [apps-review] apps-review => appsdir

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 29 November 2011 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391DC1F0C55 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:59:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.599, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQDuDaDancYg for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989D11F0C4A for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.193.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 213E722E253; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:59:43 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3373.1322598467.712718@puncture>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:59:37 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F687814E-39AC-4F3C-8BE0-BB2CE381FF37@mnot.net>
References: <4ED52A29.4080604@stpeter.im> <4ED52A4D.5050502@stpeter.im> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C152A6@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <3373.1322598467.712718@puncture>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: Apps Area Review List <apps-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-review] apps-review => appsdir
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:59:46 -0000

We need an underground room with a circular table. And big maps. And drinks. 

Something like this:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59YKlP--PhU


On 30/11/2011, at 7:27 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:

> On Tue Nov 29 20:13:04 2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Going from "Review Team" to "Directorate" is cool, but have we hit a glass ceiling?  Or is there something above this, like "APPS Review Council", that we can look forward to?
> 
> Council, Board, Cabal, Mafia... These are all well and good, but everyone has those kinds of titles these days.
> 
> Maybe we can all become Knights Grandmaster of the Venerable Order Of Apps? That'd suit me, but then, I've never been the fussy type.
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@dave.cridland.net
> - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
> - http://dave.cridland.net/
> Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
> _______________________________________________
> apps-review mailing list
> apps-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/