Re: [apps-review] Reminder: Request for review: draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr-06

SM <> Tue, 19 April 2011 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0344E06C8 for <>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYWpgWqGjOEq for <>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BBCE065C for <>; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3J9avWL027699; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:37:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1303205824; bh=di7jhN0IiTK3X0c+MOuTQS1xF54=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=C1qsWomjok8JuIqEhWai0u54eKBvZBQzKBytrkqfPexED1ValECxfBNsytjkXZruB 5io+GDa4z1PnY4dMA+wsAQjB6zWclLcBCjd0yINk2DvR+MhR+KUBolWBeaU240nYLR uPzVMVjU3X23zBrNZsZvQePKssOMO40Ijttl0nhI=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:36:42 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <>, Joseph Yee <>
From: SM <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Reminder: Request for review: draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:37:40 -0000

Hi Julian, Joseph,
At 01:58 19-04-2011, Julian Reschke wrote:
>I can do a fully mechanical check (ABNF, references, keywords, etc), 
>but I do not have *any* knowledge about the technical matter. I'll 
>do what I can today, but maybe somebody else can take over with the remainder?

Can you do the mechanical checks?

Joseph, can you do the rest of the review?  I would have done the 
DDDS part if I had the time over the next few days.  If you don't 
have the time, I'll do it as it is less effort than finding another 
reviewer for the assignment.

I suggest that you do a joint review if both of you accept the assignment.

Best regards,