Re: [apps-review] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 02 May 2011 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564C1E06EF for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cyNGtDl+dx9b for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845A1E06CB for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.elandsys.com ([41.136.239.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p42FwvYq020964; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:59:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1304351945; bh=25Nz+bT38PMyvQ2Aj28ysk3G+8k=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=FLyS99nggpI6ncBSjLUSry+sr0TOvRqggylmM+o3Uh6eIc1tnEPvd4ijq1iH+BzIk 0YBFkbI5/QB07vYyOnYqe9WEVupAsDzrYP1phT2+4JB/MqyBOXR2HuueFPuOznGWT8 2G4Q53CkAlZjxnO+G075W+j0LsNvQyfkpIxIKaBw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110502084902.05311de0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 08:52:07 -0700
To: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DBEBD8D.1080209@bbiw.net>
References: <4DBB4A83.7010408@dcrocker.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110430123750.02f98dd0@resistor.net> <4DBEBD8D.1080209@bbiw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:59:14 -0000

Hi Dave,
At 07:19 02-05-2011, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>>I have this document on the list of assignments to be made. I generally avoid
>>doing a review of a document on which I have previously commented. Would you
>>like to take on the assignment?
>
>ok.

Thanks.

BTW, I made a mistake and copied my previous message to ietf@ instead 
of apps-review.

Best regards,
-sm