Re: [appsdir] request to review draft-ietf-lmap-yang-00

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 20 April 2015 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AE81B2F82 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phMrlRn7DViH for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495521B2F81 for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4463; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429546524; x=1430756124; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=84pCC8BVtcnMk+id29EdmABKqg6shCGu9PvKF+76xnQ=; b=Eaj9Ltxc+xvEI1J2saKTAocoUC8b8SFhYdo4UMT6qoxbXbfn1YCKyNsh iI4h0+FmtEWLeQQrutdxb39+xOp/9x24069Xz30YViqsMQ66loIkno0cn sZUEMl5At0NnNXRQNUKbev+3cz7d1RHn4uq0FBMdcK76/7sKXwYIvPqb4 M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D7AwCwJTVV/xbLJq1bg15cgxfCPQmBT4YDAoFuFAEBAQEBAQF9hCEBAQQjVQEQCwQUCRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiCcNtiqUJQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReKNYEChQQHgmiBRQEEkxuBNFiGJYFZhU2NfCKDdTwygkMBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,609,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="436415365"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2015 16:15:22 +0000
Received: from [10.61.171.100] ([10.61.171.100]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3KGFM1O016109; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:22 GMT
Message-ID: <55352619.2000409@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:15:21 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <552E498E.1040106@cisco.com> <553516C9.70002@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <553516C9.70002@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dRUIb8kbHcvp7mSk5NH3NRUxdTkcMw0Ev"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/appsdir/0EJVlPQQU3RduQ21WjqmKHX1fIc>
Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] request to review draft-ietf-lmap-yang-00
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:26 -0000

Thank you, Alexey.  If it's going to be a little later, that's okay
since we're doing earlier reviews.  But let me know...

Eliot


On 4/20/15 5:10 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> On 15/04/2015 12:20, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> Alexey,
> Hi Eliot,
>>
>> Can you take on an Apps Directorate review of draft-ietf-lmap-yang-00
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lmap-yang-00>?  The initial
>> review indicates that model contains aspects of calendaring,
>> something you know a lot about.
> I should be able to review the document by May 1st, although a bit
> short on free time at the moment.
>> As a reminder, the templates for reviews are at
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template.  This is an
>> early review (we are moving to a model where they all are).  As such,
>> using the WGLC template seems best, but omitting the WGLC date.
>>
>> If you can let me know by Friday whether you can do this, that would
>> be great.   The review would be due around the 1 May 2015.
>