[appsdir] Review Request: draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-33

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 13 August 2015 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0C21A7004 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqlpbhQLjJnc for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365F41A700E for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9318; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1439478677; x=1440688277; h=references:subject:to:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KIpPFTVBoItdBOqM+nmDEX0JHzQWgiKp7zZrdajiYV8=; b=LIjKzeyrf6O+Izma/isnCgvuHrfgFcQ40BlPu+/sH2BNC67pHpeKo20/ VQzvNs6Gv6Msc7T8Bi+1Oa4LFqS+N171Y1lnOPExxKbReL7tuY+BdB78b C3TNgSeLwlWp5NRHi/JjT0NtbJy1S2avLkK3EhaKp09vpQ6xbExbXjZpg Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AGAwAbs8xV/xbLJq1dg29pgyS6XAqBd4V3AoF3FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEI0sKARAsFgsCAgkDAgECATQRBg0GAgEBiCoNunmWQgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVBItThQkHgmmBQwEElRqCPoFcaodogUqEK4J3hhOLIyaDfzwzgkwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,670,1432598400"; d="asc'?eml'208?scan'208,208";a="627760778"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2015 15:11:15 +0000
Received: from [10.61.109.238] (dhcp-10-61-109-238.cisco.com [10.61.109.238]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7DFBEeM006189; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:11:15 GMT
References: <20150810233319.27776.86859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20150810233319.27776.86859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <55CCB393.2070303@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:11:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150810233319.27776.86859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3l6Kvk1fVTrTm2pfv7JH2vWtthREaH3uK"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/appsdir/KzAGjcpIUctszJcvh0p-aJYYAtw>
Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>
Subject: [appsdir] Review Request: draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-33
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/appsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:11:20 -0000

Martin,

Would you be able to review draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data in the next
two weeks or so?

Thanks,

Eliot
--- Begin Message ---
The IESG has received a request from the Emergency Context Resolution
with Internet Technologies WG (ecrit) to consider the following document:
- 'Additional Data Related to an Emergency Call'
  <draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-33.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-08-24. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   When an emergency call is sent to a Public Safety Answering Point
   (PSAP), the originating device, the access network provider to which
   the device is connected, and all service providers in the path of the
   call have information about the call, the caller or the location
   which is helpful for the PSAP to have in handling the emergency.
   This document describes data structures and mechanisms to convey such
   data to the PSAP.  The intent is that every emergency call carry the
   information described here using the mechanisms described here.

   The mechanisms permit the data to be conveyed by reference (as an
   external resource) or by value (within the body of a SIP message or a
   location object).  This follows the tradition of prior emergency
   services standardization work where data can be conveyed by value
   within the call signaling (i.e., in the body of the SIP message) or
   by reference.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.



--- End Message ---