IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [appsdir] drafts needing a quick scan

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 27 April 2015 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B671A1A7B for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAtnthVD-zhL for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666C61A1A78 for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5922; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430144682; x=1431354282; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=oUlvFm1OFHMLUaZG6UeDaV8H+rxnkYaESp6fHQSg32E=; b=T4crEg2hiP5duvnqf4uiC3EdbmpuFUuQ5rfXyAiENWH3op6RPs2u8zm/ cZgDgyIeS0bGEbimWzCwEAZoeyrx063+ma5Bal6KR+uE5qIle0CQJBFKY 5CqM1iR2MvSD+JresWB4h+SPNx5tO4vAXFL5fCfPXhW+chsQ5VPC1ZOpm w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D/AwBjRT5V/xbLJq1cg19cgxrDJQmBSAEJhTZOAoFqFAEBAQEBAQGBCoQhAQEEAQEBIEsKARALBBQJFggDAgIJAwIBAgEVHxEGDQEFAgEBiCcNsw+TagEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEiziFBQeCaIFFAQSTR4E3hxCHOY4oI4N2PDGCRAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,657,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="469579832"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2015 14:24:39 +0000
Received: from [10.61.171.173] ([10.61.171.173]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3REOdhO025344; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:24:39 GMT
Message-ID: <553E46A6.3080901@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:24:38 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <553DE8A8.6020901@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMBW6tAGuvQw03E+kZhnK_xJ0RBc=sJ=z0YhHb=S_Hv2MA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBW6tAGuvQw03E+kZhnK_xJ0RBc=sJ=z0YhHb=S_Hv2MA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CctAho548WgB3GflxnIS7SukA2twhmDGi"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/appsdir/isjOMnBebFenyqVzLZ76qq0fQNk>
Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] drafts needing a quick scan
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:24:45 -0000

Ted,

Thanks for stepping up.  What I will do is mark it as requiring HTTP
experience, and assign accordingly.

Eliot

On 4/27/15 4:07 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> I've followed the legally restricted status discussion from Tim Bray's
> first proposal, though not with any great insight.  It's fundamentally
> a status code addition for HTTP; other groups might be interested in
> following it if they usually adopt HTTP status codes, since they might
> or might not want to follow the practice with this one.
>
> Ted
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com
> <mailto:lear@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello everyone,
>
>     If you have a few moments would you kindly scan a few of these drafts
>     for initial review?
>     > draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt
>     > draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-00.txt
>     > draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-00.txt
>     > draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-00.txt
>     > draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping-00.txt
>     > draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-00.txt
>
>     This is just to determine skills needed, and whether there is any apps
>     area intersection.
>
>     Thanks in advance,
>
>     Eliot
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     appsdir mailing list
>     appsdir@ietf.org <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email