IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> Thu, 13 November 2014 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rs@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED251A0069 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:03:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rx-SFhLSE6bT for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:03:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE451A0065 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:03:46 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,372,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="167068110"
Received: from hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.36]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2014 16:03:46 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.38) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:03:46 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::7d24:377:dc4c:f0b5%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:03:45 -0800
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
Thread-Index: AQHP/X9VM8sRfIuCX0mm7czZ5TwXK5xeMPeA//99mtA=
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:03:44 +0000
Message-ID: <cf344e47f30e4cd49afa04280b4cbeef@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
References: <D086F727.B6AF%ropan@cisco.com> <5463F169.6020805@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5463F169.6020805@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/1Y-VyMWZVkzL2AcmvcfwgDRnrvM
Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:03:51 -0000

Hi Martin,

I believe these papers may qualify that requirement:

http://ipv6.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/DOCSIS-AQM_May2014.pdf
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6925768
https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/37381

tl;dr - both pie and codel camps did some independent implementations and testing of the respective other algorithm, with discussions and denting out some poorly described aspects in that process. It's my understanding that this lead to a better quality of the drafts in both instances.



Richard Scheffenegger




> -----Original Message-----
> From: aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Mittwoch, 12. November 2014 13:47
> To: aqm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
> 
> [writing not as AD, but as random IETF participant]
> 
> Sorry for this blunt question:
> 
> Is there any other analysis made by an independent source, i.e., where not
> the PIE authors are running an analysis of PIE?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    Martin
> 
> Am 10.11.14 um 21:15 schrieb Rong Pan (ropan):
> > Please see our analysis paper on PIE...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rong
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aqm mailing list
> > aqm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email