Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"

Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org> Mon, 02 March 2015 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gnra-aqm@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F0F1A1ABF for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:06:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pa_mNSPNNxWJ for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C7D1A8930 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:06:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gnra-aqm@m.gmane.org>) id 1YSWbx-0004n3-N5 for aqm@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:06:42 +0100
Received: from 32.97.110.57 ([32.97.110.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:06:41 +0100
Received: from wmf by 32.97.110.57 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:06:41 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: aqm@ietf.org
From: Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:06:33 -0600
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <md2fsa$o1s$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAA93jw7KW=9PH002d3Via5ks6+mHScz5VDhpPVqLUGK2K=Mhew@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.110.57
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7KW=9PH002d3Via5ks6+mHScz5VDhpPVqLUGK2K=Mhew@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/4HdaqClP7RfKNUaCjcGHdRPFIFw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:10:04 -0800
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 20:06:55 -0000

What about a token bucket policer, so more than N ICMP/second gets 
penalized but a normal ping won't be.

-- 
Wes Felter