Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)

"Rong Pan (ropan)" <ropan@cisco.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ropan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC0312D620; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id It0ViZ7mkoxw; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7658712D963; Tue, 24 May 2016 10:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=471; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464112051; x=1465321651; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=GwgNpCMS+onfLDOwyurV9PjzzbzE+5YATNUh2e78fZw=; b=aYslA/aTDeF1BHC8dNWZGwXiPLrNkwHOmFSTMJLT3whM9T4Jh+311Hnq 3jS/+SvNfxVqhxOq+oMKc0Ni6eIeGIvhBBehCpvQA7oCTYYUIuq3+9hf3 y5AZqFfkkqEhM++BiVJNjYKtjrJ08tpzBl4wSkXuDJBmYtai73tqx7mT8 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AhAgC7kkRX/4YNJK1cDoMpgVm3aIIPAQ2BdoYRAoEzOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEQwEBBDo/EAIBCDYQMiUCBAENiDMBxAkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchieETIoZAQSYNwGOH4FTjUmPSwEeAQFCgzI7iXYBfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,360,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="277307383"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 May 2016 17:47:30 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4OHlUlH012191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 May 2016 17:47:30 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:47:29 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com ([173.36.7.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:47:29 -0500
From: "Rong Pan (ropan)" <ropan@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRsco/n/0Jo9goFEeHpIM14lC8t5/At8gAgAaAMACAAMbagIAARLuA
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:47:29 +0000
Message-ID: <D369E17F.188C5%ropan@cisco.com>
References: <20160519123034.17334.51236.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <573DDCC0.3010604@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <D368FE65.18891%ropan@cisco.com> <5743F795.10008@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5743F795.10008@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [171.71.130.224]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <853BCBE9AFD33441B4BED91532BFBC23@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/9XbJ0EOH3KBhVjkPqLGWxMQ0Yqc>
Cc: "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-aqm-pie@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-aqm-pie@ietf.org>, "aqm-chairs@ietf.org" <aqm-chairs@ietf.org>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:47:33 -0000

Got it and included the following to draft version 08.

Thanks,

Rong



>I believe you missed the most important point, i.e. explaining in the
>text that the RFC2309 is obsolete.
>For example:
>
>     "Back in 1998, RFC 2309[RFC2309], now obsoleted by RFC7567,
>     strongly recommended the adoption of AQM schemes in the network to
>     improve the performance of the Internet."
>
>Regards, Benoit
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rong
>>
>> .
>>
>