IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 06 July 2015 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F991A0145 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yVqzArFCqKxq for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623411A009D for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1537; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436217103; x=1437426703; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=UuT45bI4K8Ol6buJCbT+Un22Txq3BvPVtMwC2V2i/k4=; b=gZVsB0kC2Bipnq1nf6i8AFkU3GstsWWtNo9U7dhK0FEw7CJyjNVlipjH ysmRQ5f7ujjkJHerWRolElik0VupjH2JurMT4TwF+0Ciu0L8UxDfiCfM/ jbVBZxmqGvqLCl/6Is08M8qzV022NsPjKxqvclZo3KSGdD20qAZfPKWKn Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C8AwD/7ZpV/5RdJa1cgxKBNAa9VwmHZQKBOzgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQEDAXkFCwIBCBguIRElAgQOBQ6ICwMKCMVxDYVuAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4tLgk2BYVgHgxeBFAWUFQGCKoFShgaBZZE5hx0mY4MYb4EFQoEEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,417,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="166085198"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Jul 2015 21:11:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t66LBgt4019898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 21:11:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.49]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:11:42 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation
Thread-Index: AQHQuDBaRO+dmLu6tE6PvvXDcBXtwg==
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:11:41 +0000
Message-ID: <151E5FC0-022F-4F45-9DAD-2C4C950A29D6@cisco.com>
References: <D1961A16.1087%hokano@cisco.com> <5577FBD3.5000804@student.kit.edu> <97EDD2D8-CC0A-4AFA-9A74-3F2C282CF5C2@cisco.com> <87mvzem9i9.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk> <7E6C797B-EE6F-4390-BC8F-606FDD8D5195@cisco.com> <559659A8.9030104@student.kit.edu> <70758B15-FD12-4941-A58C-2EFD9FEB859B@cisco.com> <CAA93jw5vFhzemxBjA4=gYYfOFF+JfS_E1nFuMZX4y2nZ1p-=zg@mail.gmail.com> <382138AB-1AEC-408F-8CB1-935EDFB5EBF6@cisco.com> <CAA93jw5AuKvDsXG-6R4HD7y61GhcigLAvX3iFUL6-0tf2Y+Qeg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5AuKvDsXG-6R4HD7y61GhcigLAvX3iFUL6-0tf2Y+Qeg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.123]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3A287B64-A037-4B42-B85C-AEE882FE1030"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/A3UBVRZrhtCd5XuLyXQjarUJmfA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-aqm-pie@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-aqm-pie@tools.ietf.org>, "Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco)" <hokano@cisco.com>, Polina Goltsman <uucpf@student.kit.edu>, AQM IETF list <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:11:55 -0000

> On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> yep! Sorry! What is the current limit on number of queues, however?

At what point do we declare this a rathole and return to the algorithm?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email