Subject: Re: [aqm] [tcpm] TCP ACK Suppression
From: Joe Touch <[email-masked]>
To: David Lang <[email-masked]>, Jonathan Morton <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "LAUTENSCHLAEGER, Wolfram \(Wolfram\)" <[email-masked]>, Greg White <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:13:46 -0700
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>

On 10/10/2015 8:45 PM, David Lang wrote:
> But I actually view this as a tragedy of the commons situation. Sending
> the extra packets doesn't hurt you, but it does mean that you are using
> more airtime than you need, and that hurts everyone (including,
> eventually, you)

So, basically, you appreciate the tragedy of the commons when it's your
tragedy and their commons, but not the other way around?

(using 'sed')

s/sending the extra/altering the transport/

s/using more airtime/altering E2E semantics/

Joe