Re: [aqm] updated draft charter

grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au> Thu, 11 July 2013 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC9B21F9B0A for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.725
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.725 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vlzU1eH2j1aP for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF1221F92BB for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [136.186.229.37] (garmitage.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.37]) by gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6BK0cDW019328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:00:39 +1000
Message-ID: <51DF0EE6.3080203@swin.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:00:38 +1000
From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121107 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: aqm@ietf.org
References: <51DE398B.2090103@mti-systems.com> <CAGhGL2BnTXuZejwf5C38MndMKbm+eM2ANWjJt+pwQFp89ECpFg@mail.gmail.com> <91b91547d0e717bf6376929bb55bf81f.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <02FA5F0F-C331-4000-A716-D074734F56D0@telecom-bretagne.eu>
In-Reply-To: <02FA5F0F-C331-4000-A716-D074734F56D0@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [aqm] updated draft charter
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:01:19 -0000

On 07/12/2013 02:21, David Ros wrote:
>
> On 11 juil. 2013, at 18:06, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
	[..]
>> If SQM was short for  scheduling and queue management I may have
>> liked the abbreviation more, ... let's see where this discussion
>> ends.

Like it too.

>
> Since we're looking for acronyms that (a) are pronounceable, (b) do
> not sound like a marketing gimmick, (c) match to a WG name that
> conveys the essence of what the WG will do, then why not simply:
> QMAPS? (Queue Management And Packet Scheduling).

QUEUE -- Queue Utilisation for Enhanced User Experience ?

(Thank you, I'll be here all week...)

cheers,
gja