Re: [aqm] AQM support in the network
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 19 March 2013 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2105C21F8C48 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2KSQ7L+F-yp for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9001C21F8B20 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 56AA89C; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:37:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8969A; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:37:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:37:02 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGhGL2DZ30YKpZfekcXsx4m6OjGinOnJtzvFfFOmVQihnknh4g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1303191934100.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <201303190906.32352.mkuehle@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1303191023220.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAGhGL2DZ30YKpZfekcXsx4m6OjGinOnJtzvFfFOmVQihnknh4g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>, aqm@ietf.org, Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [aqm] AQM support in the network
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:37:04 -0000
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Jim Gettys wrote: > You might imagine so. But from what I've seen, you'll often be > disappointed. Your mileage will definitely vary. It's been a long time since I last saw buffering of more than 50ms on a congested core link (I'm talking 1G link or up). But we're talking about 90% of the traffic being DSCP BE going into a single queue with RED dropping most traffic around 50ms of buffer depth. That's why I was saying that I don't really want to call this AQM. It's not very "advanced". -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
- [aqm] AQM support in the network Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [aqm] AQM support in the network Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [aqm] AQM support in the network Jim Gettys
- Re: [aqm] AQM support in the network Mikael Abrahamsson