Re: [aqm] [tcpm] TCP ACK Suppression

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sat, 10 October 2015 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAE11ACEF9; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YOILyCQQhHNH; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97191A911F; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbwr8 with SMTP id r8so111751164lbw.2; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=02gLUe+Z/Yu+lxfqgEmT8RB5mGTOkPGXcnwcLpU4/Xk=; b=SMeuEmUuD3dmNphzlw4cyKRNpMFhLLExpi1TyFWVQgrHpvgZFMr9LTpZEMa+990Odu xiGZDdAnMgxi5lk7FDdn0zw6SIkMsx6dZ/d1UKimb/9wD4sdz65TMgA+mJZhM6iVaMR4 68ySQPbobSAPueicJxHYL6RP0+N0p1uUW45w/iin0LoLCMuT8pbtlnA3qShKK3FtPCXx pRUKrqky61lO/zsNqOdcHL8WwIn6Hz//Df4+SRP1ju3GDx6oCuuIIm5/VS5/KmgLjucf v7bHjJEUM0HPdNn6AO8pYwpbYpIUdLV2GmqTtBgaK5MhFdwSSPcH9lb/OIsiUHrqyIxj Tp1w==
X-Received: by 10.112.134.197 with SMTP id pm5mr9574800lbb.3.1444518773946; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (176-93-46-50.bb.dnainternet.fi. [176.93.46.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jb10sm1489442lbc.46.2015.10.10.16.12.52 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw64aE+to_=Q0suMBLuPDaZV+wU9mD4RWO55=NdD0jk_fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 02:12:49 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ABCBBA02-5AB4-4B27-9AE2-6C1E93E8BEA0@gmail.com>
References: <5618005A.8070303@isi.edu> <70335.1444421059@lawyers.icir.org> <D23D8CA5.54DF5%g.white@cablelabs.com> <56183B49.4000506@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510091511540.3717@nftneq.ynat.uz> <56183E93.1010308@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510091528320.3717@nftneq.ynat.uz> <5618420E.9040609@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510091628010.3717@nftneq.ynat.uz> <5618554F.3080103@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510091716100.3717@nftneq.ynat.uz> <56185E44.9050702@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510091910170.3717@nftneq.ynat.uz> <561891C3.90004@isi.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510092134190.15683@nftneq.ynat.uz> <CAA93jw64aE+to_=Q0suMBLuPDaZV+wU9mD4RWO55=NdD0jk_fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/N_lN9oinAoDee4n_AGsiA-vUcVI>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, "mallman@icir.org" <mallman@icir.org>, "LAUTENSCHLAEGER, Wolfram \(Wolfram\)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@alcatel-lucent.com>, Greg White <g.white@cablelabs.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] [tcpm] TCP ACK Suppression
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:12:57 -0000

> On 11 Oct, 2015, at 02:06, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would certainly have preferred a wifi world that instead of all
> stations and APs highly contending for bursty access to a single
> 320mhz channel, we had 160 dedicated, low latency, 5mhz channels, but
> that is not what the IEEE has handed us.

Dual radios would be a useful compromise - one 20-40 MHz channel to the AP, one from it.  Stations would still need to negotiate for the channel in the uplink direction, but the AP would be able to transmit on the downlink more freely.

 - Jonathan Morton