Re: [aqm] I am setting up a per holiday cron job

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20A5129A96 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Njfc79mW4KG4 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0FFD129A95 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i68so91622096uad.0 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oAdJITGerVbJ8mAVYHPZxbKshMymwG/srbbcWDlyhjY=; b=TpPpLIsDXM3xHUTD6xc6k33s5nHeaMfNSZ8uUqJfe63Qv1Fq3FG5MEUx6SvwotJjxn r2pXYMTtOMwjlT0TY4iLpMDRZSv/3C0Nc25Ie4MyVlP7scnIgVogIKlaEC327pgtd177 1+a+wZ53M8v+3Fx6ov2hV8NKBdB/1Yrt1eboJJmvNkwELoz1SyIlnSltBQN3YIfXbjy6 CmEnkWHoOO7BdRC+rP8pBcR7F0QEGcpK6E5GLV3alDb84oYzjzjVWXv8teAOLME7Jf+3 AwKeqWFrT3RNVfflyOnvLulA9tkiIRxqS1h5MhCBVEBL/t1TWz3JasNOqglPOsHJYTrv nNgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oAdJITGerVbJ8mAVYHPZxbKshMymwG/srbbcWDlyhjY=; b=WMy4dhn5MLeTkcI99h609bH+yRmxbU0f8HlK6MPsLHuc0q9ygiOUrejKHW9FzGcYS9 5gAEDlCp99hbQANDlLRjvMqlIH8mHzrtqT8Hd8tTLozMOggJUPpgJMwczf2KLvGd1dqJ 5WZmcL6EF3T1Y22PG2fbUN+9uKIMsnv/opHy1zurysJnSNqVcQUtDg5aRGHF+EOVLKpH yrsOu6DwwFPUvvRaRrWcJCGNaME0R0y7C/za5lmTYt36OxsDWZnQ+R0VgiZZRibABoGl ptpOC6AqBrzMNuC2I+rMLW/ApI4RH9InnzSQnJ0javkYpOhECK89nKGs3D3eXqwIHw15 /G+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nQ/yl2hdWJb6hpov5MZjTmH6IAGCwk2OVB266BW3SSiSZKtZTtQdc6Sxs11dTpfJFdoxgDKmcpU0+RAJ/4
X-Received: by 10.159.38.73 with SMTP id 67mr13803750uag.155.1487096966501; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.51.14 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d5b720b3-2bb2-66b3-8573-638e323de352@mti-systems.com>
References: <CAA93jw5UZTbohs01aMwiHfggG+ytSZKZmQfkys-V2mpVh8+dnw@mail.gmail.com> <d5b720b3-2bb2-66b3-8573-638e323de352@mti-systems.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:29:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZbWL65kKjk3vuXgh+SHsh+1TybPiwhjysyTJ5YkwS+5cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114950dc6ffd74054881bef7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/NkvDk9TpeQiEnO2_sZt_W8fzNzo>
Cc: aqm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [aqm] I am setting up a per holiday cron job
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:29:30 -0000

As Wes responded, we're working out the bits of code and the license in the
draft. We have resolution, and I need to get a revised draft to the AD with
some changes in.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:

> Hi Dave, thanks for asking :)
>
> Since I've been the assigned shepherd for both, here's an update for the
> working group on status:
>
> - The fq-codel draft cleared the working group last call, IETF last call,
> and IESG reviews, and has been waiting in the RFC Editor's queue on the
> codel draft (in RFC editor cluster #288: https://www.rfc-editor.org/clu
> ster_info.php?cid=C288 ).
>
> - The codel draft cleared the working group last call, and is in AD
> review, with some comments back and forth between Mirja and the editors.
> As I understand, there is a question about compatibility between the IETF
> Trust statements at the beginning and later text in the document that talks
> about copyright and licensing of code snippets, which they are working
> through and getting advice on.
>
>
>
> On 2/14/2017 1:30 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> the template:
>>
>> For [INSERT HOLIDAY], I'd really love to see a codel & fq_codel RFC
>> published.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>