Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-00.txt

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rs@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E9A1A872B for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FoIdIObPq__6 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx141.netapp.com (mx141.netapp.com [216.240.21.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C19361A870D for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:00:30 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,643,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="26559486"
Received: from hioexcmbx02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.35]) by mx141-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2015 01:55:32 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.38) by hioexcmbx02-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:55:29 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::c4b3:e711:88fe:6ce%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:55:29 -0800
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP720lSp5KkDElEkGOkiSU5MFZZZ0B4h+Q
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:55:29 +0000
Message-ID: <384483c0c4fc474c82dac550ac3ef751@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
References: <20141024092948.9876.61739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141024092948.9876.61739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/Pnnb9u9CXhhuWJvGJP3wU9MbS-4>
Cc: "'gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk'" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "steve@wreck.net" <steve@wreck.net>, "'mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch'" <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, "Michael Welzl \(michawe@ifi.uio.no\)" <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, "'Andrew McGregor' \(andrewmcgr@gmail.com\)" <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-00.txt
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:54 -0000

Hi,


As discussed during IETF91, we are aiming to get a WGLC on this document.

Please review this rather short draft - there has been some feedback in Honolulu, which should have been addressed in the adoped version already.

Please review this document in preparation for the Dallas meeting, and provide feedback!

Thanks,
  Richard (AQM Co-Chair)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Freitag, 24. Oktober 2014 11:30
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: aqm@ietf.org
> Subject: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-00.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet
> Scheduling Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : The Benefits and Pitfalls of using Explicit
> Congestion Notification (ECN)
>         Authors         : Michael Welzl
>                           Godred Fairhurst
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2014-10-24
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes the potential benefits and pitfalls when
>    applications enable Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN).  It
>    outlines the principal gains in terms of increased throughput,
>    reduced delay and other benefits when ECN is used over network paths
>    that include equipment that supports ECN-marking.  It also lists
>    potential problems that might occur when ECN is used.  The document
>    does not propose new algorithms that may be able to use ECN or
>    describe the details of implementation of ECN in endpoint devices,
>    routers and other network devices.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-00
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm