[aqm] Immediate ECN: Autotuning AQM for RTT

Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6111E82A3; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.394, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UVJ-4Qk7eMgB; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hubrelay-rd.bt.com (hubrelay-rd.bt.com [62.239.224.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BC821F99F8; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:03:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EVMHR01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.40) by EVMHR66-UKRD.bt.com (10.187.101.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:03:12 +0000
Received: from EPHR01-UKIP.domain1.systemhost.net (147.149.196.177) by EVMHR01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.297.1; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:03:12 +0000
Received: from bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (132.146.168.158) by EPHR01-UKIP.domain1.systemhost.net (147.149.196.177) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:03:12 +0000
Received: from BTP075694.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.109.144.199]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id rA7K38dj008566; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:03:09 GMT
Message-ID: <201311072003.rA7K38dj008566@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:03:08 +0000
To: tsv-area IETF list <tsv-area@ietf.org>, AQM IETF list <aqm@ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
Subject: [aqm] Immediate ECN: Autotuning AQM for RTT
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:03:37 -0000

Folks,

"Immediate ECN" slides:
<http://bobbriscoe.net/presents/1311ietf/1311tsvarea-iecn.pptx>
<http://bobbriscoe.net/presents/1311ietf/1311tsvarea-iecn.pdf>

PS. This talk fell off the end of the TSVAREA agenda. It's mostly 
relevant to AQM, but I didn't originally bring it to AQM, because it 
affects 3 wgs: tsvwg, aqm & tcpm.

In the AQM wg, there was dismay about CableLabs not including 
anything about ECN in DOCSIS3.1. This talk is about AQM dynamics; and 
how ECN can take out the 100ms of delay that CoDel and PIE introduce 
- it's essentially about auto-tuning for RTT.

It gives an interim recommendation for hardware designers that there 
should be a second instance of the AQM algo for ECN packets so that 
it can be configured with different parameters (think of WRED instead of RED).

Specifically, for ECN packets:
interval = 0 (for CoDel)
max_burst = 0 (for PIE)


Bob

PS. We have a paper under submission, which we can supply on request.
We plan to document this in the IETF too.




________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                                  BT