[aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu> Thu, 14 December 2017 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CE7126FDC for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:35:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJTTNjFi2LQp for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8524F1243F3 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([] helo=i72vorta.tm.kit.edu) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25 iface id 1ePbAS-0001Qy-8t; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:35:48 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost []) by i72vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160C1B00DA9; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:35:48 +0100 (CET)
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, "LAUTENSCHLAEGER, Wolfram (Wolfram)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@nokia.com>
From: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Message-ID: <468c391d-7e18-e67c-d1b6-b6526eb8d9e3@kit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:35:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1513287348.323049199
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/RUWZD6pa1085rS0p7By9BC30bcs>
Subject: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:35:53 -0000

Hi folks,

I was wondering what happened to the GSP AQM proposal
(draft-lauten-aqm-gsp see
Discussion seems to have ended after IETF 93 and we probably
missed the point of discussing WG adoption.
IMHO this AQM should also be documented as RFC. It performs extremely
well in some settings (better than CoDel or PIE) and its implementation
complexity is also lower. Wolfram, are you interested in finishing this?
Should we continue in tsvwg?