Re: [aqm] I am setting up a per holiday cron job

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6EE129588 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:26:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lU6FbPymt3rh for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:26:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ADB4129530 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:26:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id c7so37247017itd.1 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:26:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8tX433VUAvX+3c65QLWX309i+GdvzRSFjx/NHYUiDsc=; b=nwBWTwBt1CV8kYYISdbNVGScokM+6ptuwyYA9fxlHzjEFoeWmXIakQqgrDmVFRSj/q oySaHmC8gmiW/VyJMg/QKgxSkk0JW+vuTXVGTdicNRizXtculLHIKAjogrKW6+rxqb+S VD8X98V5BzkANO3SHka74A5H0rgsHY96iFb8dyKZdVxj84ZzRgPBksT5dKW4U1ZXN5jb 613QwEmWtbOOnHh+yek7zMlnLcCYgTqI/3hLURGFeqRDZhr98vxz+OabtuBPvDJUWgLI ZYzf77SNDqX1AcQdt/Ylrq0lCdYhqcEyxj5/ononc7uzmgbd7bAiUntoz4fCZtxltq+f u8mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8tX433VUAvX+3c65QLWX309i+GdvzRSFjx/NHYUiDsc=; b=S4B4lIaHYjodq9hbJmNc19ey2PMiIALSu8VUleWaV6xajEXMThMM5Wuttfoi06LncO pk8mSIcnLgCOYWnP1LGBrcRL5MmueuaF0aFCx+YDi7IY7gGGuw0XHQuuUxXY6uirQr+F R9NWv+T2Ejwo8OzlgHO8ib6Fb2K8moCX3T3YHQR3GyiV/t8DTRHhHgq5Q4QP2Tw2g305 150oaJQgEIpyzgTHe4RRGyTTEo9NQX1g/OT8aEeVaVwR60BE+0uTSWN4x8og5qs98k2U 9YeCoy2hedh8yvND3rFh6hmdN9ExR62QXqDTYxVaEx6vtXieInL4cIC+tUTZ44x/1Cxe 7sMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nXw+mH4eMOwwrX00eiPAnaa2uI57GUtsF/Y1PJb+kHVpFQSLCSK5R6RfMD4ME0Eg==
X-Received: by 10.36.185.93 with SMTP id k29mr3898335iti.66.1487085997690; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (cpe-76-188-215-129.neo.res.rr.com. [76.188.215.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 188sm1413195itm.12.2017.02.14.07.26.36 for <aqm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:26:37 -0800 (PST)
To: aqm@ietf.org
References: <CAA93jw5UZTbohs01aMwiHfggG+ytSZKZmQfkys-V2mpVh8+dnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <d5b720b3-2bb2-66b3-8573-638e323de352@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:26:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5UZTbohs01aMwiHfggG+ytSZKZmQfkys-V2mpVh8+dnw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/SrgXNHSfNtmfEbNRjH9eEUJvcJE>
Subject: Re: [aqm] I am setting up a per holiday cron job
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:26:40 -0000

Hi Dave, thanks for asking :)

Since I've been the assigned shepherd for both, here's an update for the 
working group on status:

- The fq-codel draft cleared the working group last call, IETF last 
call, and IESG reviews, and has been waiting in the RFC Editor's queue 
on the codel draft (in RFC editor cluster #288: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C288 ).

- The codel draft cleared the working group last call, and is in AD 
review, with some comments back and forth between Mirja and the 
editors.  As I understand, there is a question about compatibility 
between the IETF Trust statements at the beginning and later text in the 
document that talks about copyright and licensing of code snippets, 
which they are working through and getting advice on.



On 2/14/2017 1:30 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> the template:
>
> For [INSERT HOLIDAY], I'd really love to see a codel & fq_codel RFC published.
>
>
>
>