Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Tue, 03 March 2015 06:45 UTC
Return-Path: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D31A037D for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:45:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-Sg85y3rEoW for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omr1.cc.vt.edu (omr1.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2001:468:c80:2105:0:2fc:76e3:30de]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC3E1A0378 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 22:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mr4.cc.vt.edu (mr4.cc.vt.edu [198.82.164.236] (may be forged)) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t236jW8U017669; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:45:32 -0500
Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr4.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t236jRgU028699; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:45:32 -0500
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2601:b:3180:4d3:98a7:cba4:3646:20d4]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t236jPWj003880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 01:45:26 -0500
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:17:33 +0100." <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503021108270.20507@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <CAA93jw7KW=9PH002d3Via5ks6+mHScz5VDhpPVqLUGK2K=Mhew@mail.gmail.com> <7B3E53F5-2112-4A50-A777-B76F928CE8F2@trammell.ch> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503021108270.20507@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1425365125_106622P"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 01:45:25 -0500
Message-ID: <34374.1425365125@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/VzY2IeGLWaKX_qCAU3chYG8Dyt0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:53:35 -0800
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered harmful"
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:45:36 -0000
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:17:33 +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson said: > We have a huge amount of information in our TCP stacks that either are > locked in there and not used properly to help users figure out what's > going on, and there is basically zero information flow between the > applications using TCP and the TCP stack itself. Each just tries to do its > best on its own layer. You might want to touch base with the 'web10g' crew, who are working on instrumenting the Linux network stack to expose more of the inner variables for analysis and tuning. http://web10g.org/
- [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered h… David Lang
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Brian Trammell
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Dave Dolson
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "cons… dpreed
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Jonathan Morton
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Brian Trammell
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered h… David Lang
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Wes Felter
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Dave Dolson
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" David Lang
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Joe Touch
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" David Lang
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Joe Touch
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" David Lang
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Wes Felter
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered h… Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Wesley Eddy
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful" Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered h… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "cons… dpreed
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] ping loss "cons… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered h… Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss "considered harmful" Rich Brown
- Re: [aqm] [Cerowrt-devel] ping loss "considered h… Matt Taggart