Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
"Bannai, Vinay" <vbannai@paypal.com> Mon, 11 November 2013 17:52 UTC
Return-Path: <vbannai@paypal.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C337B11E81C1 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:52:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SARE_FORGED_PAYPAL_C=1.3, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvLXrvAZFH0B for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phx-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com (phx-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com [216.113.172.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9962411E81C0 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:52:21 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: s=paypalcorp; d=paypal.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:CC: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:user-agent: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-CFilter; b=SjBv4nz6SSnT6hxQ6lQfmRoPbNsCPzEM3ZNsWuvK2pBQ0QDrTKCFfluv mQgVWWTEtnJQuHJgYlK1ARS1mfOwbZSBPE8jBQjOp/zI5xRYSwNjrSse3 GIVJxXVGVq/pptyVEiL46b07inqagasxobSFtc+9jz2/DvpxPMc3ybBjy I=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paypal.com; i=@paypal.com; q=dns/txt; s=paypalcorp; t=1384192342; x=1415728342; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=z6ZfWEAP8HHdihv2iTMDuS73rS/z47eVL5cHsvIIOhI=; b=KcQMO5K8DhqAkvAQJLNWaYKGWW9wOpr2Z4kaxorNiOP+vusVhxfLbZCL 51Nf9ETdA73qTBj69PAqfa0IDWB3PjhtLNyfBYJFujeMxNnViHQh0QT7d c/Qus9ttXybMY7LkXe08p77wvtc4Bfu10ZhA6PN6wE2U6zQE3UFhdYEBI w=;
X-EBay-Corp: Yes
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,679,1378882800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="154519313"
Received: from phx-vteml-003.corp.ebay.com (HELO PHX-EXMHT-003.corp.ebay.com) ([10.58.40.102]) by phx-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2013 09:52:21 -0800
Received: from PHX-EXRDA-S12.corp.ebay.com ([169.254.13.58]) by PHX-EXMHT-003.corp.ebay.com ([10.58.12.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:52:20 -0700
From: "Bannai, Vinay" <vbannai@paypal.com>
To: "tvwg@ietf.org" <tvwg@ietf.org>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Thread-Index: AQHO3pDt+rFctRFdvkiXdz7/nqOocJogLu4A
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:52:20 +0000
Message-ID: <CEA65841.11FC7%vbannai@paypal.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO48XRH_yWjikyg26+8ZRD0cvsrTc8kXQ-dc7iV7hYH9aC=oiw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [10.58.61.242]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CEA6584111FC7vbannaipaypalcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter: Scanned
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:34:31 -0800
Cc: Pat Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com>, John Kaippallimalil <John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com>, "draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines@tools.ietf.org" <draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines@tools.ietf.org>, Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:52:25 -0000
I support this draft. Vinay Bannai Cloud Engineering PayPal Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:03:45 +0000 To: "tsvwg IETF list" <tsvwg@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>>, AQM IETF list <aqm@ietf.org<mailto:aqm@ietf.org>> From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com<mailto:bob.briscoe@bt.com>> Subject: Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols? Cc: John Kaippallimalil <John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com<mailto:John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com>>, Pat Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com<mailto:pthaler@broadcom.com>>, draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines@tools.ietf.org> Folks, Pls respond if you support this being adopted as a work-group item in the IETF transport services w-g (tsvwg). The WG chairs need visibility of interest. Even better, if you're willing to read / comment / review / implement Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines> Abstract The purpose of this document is to guide the design of congestion notification in any lower layer or tunnelling protocol that encapsulates IP. The aim is for explicit congestion signals to propagate consistently from lower layer protocols into IP. Then the IP internetwork layer can act as a portability layer to carry congestion notification from non-IP-aware congested nodes up to the transport layer (L4). Following these guidelines should assure interworking between new lower layer congestion notification mechanisms, whether specified by the IETF or other standards bodies. [Cross-posting tsvwg & aqm, just in case] Bob Briscoe, also for co-authors Pat Thaler and John Kaippallimalil ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT -- Vinay Bannai Email: vbannai@gmail.com<mailto:vbannai@gmail.com> Google Voice: 415 938 7576
- [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN t… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Matt Mathis
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Michael Welzl
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Weixinpeng
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Rong Pan (ropan)
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Michael Menth
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Zhulei (A)
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … philip.eardley
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Joe Touch
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Joe Touch
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Joe Touch
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… gorry
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… gorry
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Bannai, Vinay
- Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding E… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Ruediger.Geib
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of … Ingemar Johansson S