Re: [aqm] thoughts on operational queue settings (Re: [tsvwg] CC/bleaching thoughts for draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04) (fwd)

[Mikael Abrahamsson <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jonathan Morton wrote:

> Yes, and that's a policy I can support (as far as it goes).  I'd much 
> rather have, say, 100ms of bloat than 45000ms (which I've previously 
> encountered).

So after some more testing I discovered I kind of need:

class mikabr-LE
   random-detect 50 ms 1000 ms
   bandwidth percent 5

Because the "50ms" is calculated out of the "5%", which means when there 
is no other traffic, "50ms" means 2.5ms of buffer with 0% loss 
probability. Unfortunately it means 50ms of buffer when there is lots of 
other traffic (when it's only getting 5-8% of total capacity).

But I imagine bufferbloating LE should have no negative consequences as 
there should be no interactive traffic marked with LE, right?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [e-mail]