Re: [aqm] thoughts on operational queue settings (Re: [tsvwg] CC/bleaching thoughts for draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04) (fwd)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Thu, 12 April 2018 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49646127010 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OLP_kf6kC_In for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF92124BFA for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id j68-v6so8439334lfg.13 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FrIN2QGeXP+fWWqe1iBFAREovT7uwwuOfTj/qJOO9iM=; b=kovzo+qvZu7LuxDWY+b3hr4R64gECfn3En4CXutEianavHNcVk2LVykNlYom2gzqlo mbpWbmw23YubWdWU65/K0opcOZOIkyCfmwAkA3ZLDPx3Wg3TKBYygCO1C8WmDA7WLZ6F Sy6nq2HaG4d714ntOHmyhARBHlW0bXueveDDYcMM/dJ/2XAIH/AWN1aH9QtiYLGneJeU rY8X4T2AWoycywdAY/KYxB2I5dKmnSxhoCWTK4dcE/WjupBU8J8U+nlr8mIXBrdiZbwO fnoiM+DsjVgrJ/O7iCF9ivvdacUKhp5lgWb43CA7BRfj85p9QCp+ByjzsF2hmffTJQQR Qtfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FrIN2QGeXP+fWWqe1iBFAREovT7uwwuOfTj/qJOO9iM=; b=Nj6GdrcgevZjAEvq0SDeIJWIG9fKgyDpoTRF1iCIYY9JIM5J3HtiCQYaWpaaL7IM0i I2jAwo+5DVo4YRUeTs9UbcJD/iFDlfpJlcPeYFmXp2ozBXxXQ8W1B7OUYyZfYgHAevL1 U27s14wrIqnOs7TbRsNf1Vuv1i35ncEJ38W60RatN7nzzidB8QTBYzQrC9r4vYFxOMI0 q1j0DMxAT60JOio/CpegoNabxyS7gQ28TZzk1xYqiFd1GK2oZWQhZ9h0Ijav6cCj7mDf FOqyKdXgm7D2Cd0eYF0yj1owVbIglVeB/e3Tg3Ugln8+KFirjTVtrPNwLyqu0nrN4Mxw o97g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCYHxCbKScGeAanxNSlB2ySXweIxim1+4levTdd3Na+E0uCOaPK Ifj2horEqYhwTQH8+muNX2hYIDU/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49wVoFHKAviXoKvzzvn/P/qhfSIkiTa6ajZ246e1aP6sHgY8MEW67gihlnb0krakXz/aF18rg==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:f24c:: with SMTP id d12-v6mr6268316lfk.111.1523548760869; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.239.216] (83-245-237-197-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.237.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm634195ljg.3.2018.04.12.08.59.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1804121317290.18650@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:59:18 +0300
Cc: aqm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EACAE8B2-F717-4306-8FCD-DE36312D3BD5@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1804120839290.18650@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1804121317290.18650@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/dscwFhfi0skF7zm95TAH7_XTI3E>
Subject: Re: [aqm] thoughts on operational queue settings (Re: [tsvwg] CC/bleaching thoughts for draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04) (fwd)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:59:24 -0000

> On 12 Apr, 2018, at 2:23 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>; wrote:
> 
> Again, I'm aiming to write up something about this for people to take to replace their overbuffered FIFOs they might have towards customers today, not produce something that is wonderfully great, but not widely supported in current hw.

Yes, and that's a policy I can support (as far as it goes).  I'd much rather have, say, 100ms of bloat than 45000ms (which I've previously encountered).

 - Jonathan Morton