Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B

[[e-mail]]

Thanks.

Please note the current version of the draft is:
draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00

Diff here:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-02&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00

... and that when we did the last edits we tried to include text that
relates to some of these comments.  Fred & I WILL look at your comments
and how they relate to the new draft revision and get back on the specific
points you raise.

Gorry

> Hi All,
>
> Had some comments on Fred's document. I have added the comments as track
> changes in a word document to easily see them. I used the 02 version.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Scheffenegger, Richard
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 5:02 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: Fred Baker (fred) ([e-mail]); Naeem Khademi ([e-mail])
> Subject: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
>
> Hi,
>
> this is just a simple remainder that the WG will convene also this Friday;
>
> As the mechanism update presentations took quite a bit longer than we had
> expected - and we appreciate the discussion these presentations have
> sparked - we agreed with Fred to have his presentation as the first agenda
> point on Friday; the second agenda point will be a presentation around AQM
> evaluation process and criteria.
>
>
> The Room will be Regency B (3. Floor), and we will start at 12:30.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Richard Scheffenegger
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>