IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] ACK Suppression

dpreed@reed.com Thu, 15 October 2015 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dpreed@reed.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9FD1B3341 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BUL7F2miH_JQ for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp110.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp110.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A3D1B3339 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EF0AC180835; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from app54.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp6.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CF65D180883; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: dpreed@reed.com
Received: from app54.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.4.2); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:08:32 GMT
Received: from reed.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by app54.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE327381E2F; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@reed.com, from: dpreed@reed.com) with HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:08:32 -0400
From: dpreed@reed.com
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20151015110832000000_29057"
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: html
In-Reply-To: <5F2CA872-E891-4E53-9D52-B347966D0A8E@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.1487.1444233956.7953.aqm@ietf.org> <1444247538.3556484@apps.rackspace.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510072200590.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <1444251596.768725492@apps.rackspace.com> <CY1PR0301MB0649DB7A6DDE1840CCB0B485A8360@CY1PR0301MB0649.namprd03.prod.ou tlook.com> <CAGD1bZbnCfv9GZKJ=ub6aijCbxq_3=1a+_A8WFXP3oGa6r=Lzg@mail.gmail.com> <D2418E41.54F49%g.white@cablelabs.com> <5F2CA872-E891-4E53-9D52-B347966D0A8E@gmail.com>
X-Auth-ID: dpreed@reed.com
Message-ID: <1444921712.77674114@apps.rackspace.com>
X-Mailer: webmail/11.6.1-RC
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/hAzB0mrJS-wu1gO943m7xXQ_OGc>
Cc: Greg White <g.white@cablelabs.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] ACK Suppression
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:08:37 -0000

Small packets shouldn't be supressed just because they are small... no ssh connections would work.
 


On Monday, October 12, 2015 6:39pm, "Jonathan Morton" <chromatix99@gmail.com> said:



> 
> > On 13 Oct, 2015, at 01:34, Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> wrote:
> >
> > But, unfortunately for you, middleboxes have no idea (yet) of what QUIC ack
> packets look like, so they can't prioritize them.
> 
> If they are small, then at least some boxes will take that as a sufficient hint.
> 
> - Jonathan Morton
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email