IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] [Bloat] TCP BBR paper is now generally available

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Sat, 03 December 2016 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F2E1293DF for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:50:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OpOGc7rxamVC for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com (mail-pg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7D4128E18 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id 3so11726819pgd.0 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 13:50:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3NU2oHWj1izDgpd1xuSQYiUJCt4592iaTejGbFIK+dc=; b=vEfJJknWfNiUs0Y9MGvaA0ss4fcxokz3goq752xAkverxCcmpDUHpCi51USxGmkFLt Kp7Hsyn/exgkwjj4DhuHczPAPi6bCmyG5U0HKlCi9D2VUkc9zgnfvrBlE8B9+6bpD+sB gKwKCGVoUpdA1YshxfuUwuSUEG+W3NgFzNbl6nCX0PGvx4chGDKmF3r4mBeLPIhxGfql CRmDtqX4Lu4A5HrFgjD5j3FwljizruquifdGX1kIRjU3JBqn4vFW1fTA8FEH2mpNYLHK 6S2ynE4yCB7rOqGAJi7GZd28WwCDNtVzFSWdGG766jtRuFTmOnbmKtKGgReighP7Z5Yk kyDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3NU2oHWj1izDgpd1xuSQYiUJCt4592iaTejGbFIK+dc=; b=AjAsyHnd2Uu/GFetPGRtRUS1Nmq4dxy05JdZGj0i617SwTE2lI2S1rEka8XIDGqpzP GsVOyHo68xMeZuFO4yhBp9f4qzglF31I25+hJ/a5u9chpCzJOKMqr8JQbSA+t98urGIZ 9J15YAtIiMbcRxSITKEfH4j4wixI8f1uZmmXZBxRXvLHRF0yVQyOUp7oEv3COHjruH/j HTx73yKh7ZGZ9NHWUhgzYmc0nwDUaGoCs7ILGhEKoE8I5iCube2xq4mhj1TIkEUh2F6r kT0WTxG8TMMndMFN/dyiUTwMCZClqsjnZOzZPO17idEfqu7TkHDlrWYp8ooiF5gHy9+a fECA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03WGbLGhmUWF+onItIwKTzPeJOQ3WNPYLzlCzQZheQ7Zgo4TkgWdCr1+AdXVdXryg==
X-Received: by 10.84.142.1 with SMTP id 1mr108061710plw.87.1480801838977; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.250.57] ([172.19.250.57]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm16886814pge.44.2016.12.03.13.50.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Dec 2016 13:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1480801837.18162.419.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 13:50:37 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20161203213428.GB38041@sesse.net>
References: <CALQXh-Pr+RNux5w6phqaw4kKifbB2j38JWBjCVBEog1GCYBafw@mail.gmail.com> <56F6A3AB-3A47-4178-BEFF-04E3DC23B039@gmail.com> <CADVnQymCmQ_MWSRcd+Y4=pgf3Shqnw5SfXrAkjonj+UFqtBrdA@mail.gmail.com> <20161202224006.GA5065@sesse.net> <1480721486.18162.392.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <CADVnQym9iPJ+GR7BN9fPRe3on_j=OxUD0D83DS6Dzf1xLKvtnA@mail.gmail.com> <20161203191353.GA972@sesse.net> <1480796415.18162.408.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <9A821B94-143B-446F-8852-2EB0158DD57C@gmail.com> <1480799260.18162.418.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20161203213428.GB38041@sesse.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/hJc95_w3jXBn0jfktKwo3MGpF0I>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [aqm] [Bloat] TCP BBR paper is now generally available
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:50:41 -0000

On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 22:34 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:07:40PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > What I meant was that we receive ACKS in bursts, with huge gaps between
> > them.
> 
> Note, the tcpdump is done at the receiver. I don't know if this changes the
> analysis.

If you have access to the receiver, I would be interested to know
NIC/driver used there ?

Thanks

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email