IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] ECN: was Control Theoretic Analyses of PI(E)

Vishal Misra <misra@cs.columbia.edu> Tue, 27 January 2015 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vm2020@columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1561A00F3 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVf9ctoNOUR1 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from millet.cc.columbia.edu (millet.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.72.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F269B1B2B22 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hazelnut (hazelnut.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.213.250]) by millet.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0R0DnvI014463 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:15:38 -0500
Received: from hazelnut (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hazelnut (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA73A80 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:15:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rambutan.cc.columbia.edu (rambutan.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.5]) by hazelnut (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DFC80 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com (mail-qg0-f41.google.com [209.85.192.41]) by rambutan.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t0R0FaHa002105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id q108so9557907qgd.0 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=h+ciG18j0cMF1MazhVHqdtW9RPz+ORpDLVFOdLSBS6U=; b=g5SVnRAfhSNwBRuLecDmpOgbxWDKuTNjKnUWCQV0PPnSBHAgsdVtjgGiZ/7HB1+2vb hMdVzincJc8gZ2FZxxqSeQvnxUYTRkKdKCY5fwu6MfpWHO+DqhBJ7V3vt2RyPb0BAu+f wvI0N+yTeKraFaBbmB52mBAs+r5b4/mefYqlF6V0FnGJcYYF9rKSTAZ1P7zS59oYLRZy XDynhVapgkt0YsbRQstlPFeQ2vM4zkvgPIL++sKODYZPRv92EzTpUlUabdVxjlhYLRIQ 5s8dBnyk1HOiuz+418UClgg/Ht6rBtt/AVK2xg5kXXMBfeDn4+ltntcPBrjTFUHYLrzJ LNmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNbmIKIelhAzTJJfUoeH9QP+13pak9xiBdD4LeHfBHo5pCyLNgzeh6/iO94+Fa1ptBXjbwSLs7SbSUPOSEs9aWYafWoVaemB5sE0A4U+geOcAcI/MCqu9qtFcA132HySXKdPKd
X-Received: by 10.224.46.132 with SMTP id j4mr2494039qaf.16.1422317736462; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.46.132 with SMTP id j4mr2494019qaf.16.1422317736323; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] (cpe-104-162-221-3.nyc.res.rr.com. [104.162.221.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k102sm11535226qgd.7.2015.01.26.16.15.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.4\))
From: Vishal Misra <misra@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw64CTTBxpMMkdtWPrMAG=HFCAPfyA-Dgkyx2s8pWpDLfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:15:32 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <346909CB-8B84-4277-856C-E05D770ECAE3@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <039049E6-71E2-4E55-8678-E1E0E472F87B@cs.columbia.edu> <20150126171439.GC49615@verdi> <C4A57039-EBE5-4ED6-BF74-E52B3DFBE27C@cs.columbia.edu> <CAA93jw78h76r0tXJ9e21jjAC3Ps12E0h_bVk9a9CNrDmxrYWug@mail.gmail.com> <CAA93jw64CTTBxpMMkdtWPrMAG=HFCAPfyA-Dgkyx2s8pWpDLfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.4)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.5
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/ir9C50kjtOok0d-lvPWBe7Vo26E>
Cc: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] ECN: was Control Theoretic Analyses of PI(E)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:15:57 -0000

Agreed. ECN has to be a "drop in replacement" for a drop.

-Vishal
--
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~misra/


> On Jan 26, 2015, at 6:46 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> At the moment anything that treats ECN as substantially different to
> drop in the aqm layer is kind of anathema to me as the control logic
> has to run very, very fast,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email