Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #6

grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au> Mon, 13 May 2013 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CEB21F9239 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSDrUHgz-adu for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gpo1.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo1.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7789321F92FC for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [136.186.229.37] (garmitage.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.37]) by gpo1.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r4DMk7os011493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 May 2013 08:46:18 +1000
Message-ID: <51916D2F.2020306@swin.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:46:07 +1000
From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121107 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: aqm@ietf.org
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B85A7CD@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B85A7CD@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [aqm] Question re draft-baker-aqm-recommendations recomendation #6
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:46:27 -0000

On 05/14/2013 00:00, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> Do we generally agree with the recommendation of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01#section-4.6? This is the question of continuing research.

Yes (with lurker hat on)

cheers,
gja