Re: [aqm] Comments on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01?

"LOCHIN Emmanuel" <Emmanuel.LOCHIN@isae.fr> Tue, 10 March 2015 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Emmanuel.LOCHIN@isae.fr>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D09E1B2A16 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.141
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NnHS3RQr7Wc for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpext.isae.fr (smtpext.isae.fr [193.54.120.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC48A1B2A0B for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from supmail (unknown [10.132.1.9]) by smtpext.isae.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435DB22E67D; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:29:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wali.isae.fr (wali.isae.fr [10.132.1.26]) by supmail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CF1C881EA; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:29:49 +0100 (CET)
User-Agent: SOGoMail 2.2.11a
X-Forward: 81.56.87.55
MIME-Version: 1.0
from: "LOCHIN Emmanuel" <Emmanuel.LOCHIN@isae.fr>
message-id: <4ea7-54fe9d00-1b1-154bcba0@200238022>
to: "Nicolas Kuhn" <nicolas.kuhn@telecom-bretagne.eu>
content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_=-_OpenGroupware_org_NGMime-20135-1425972539.044067-1------"
date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:28:59 +0100
in-reply-to: <6D444980-CFD4-4AEA-A0F0-A80E0765ECA3@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/kysq8jrlfzWsrKuzQrightD8EgU>
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, Naeem Khademi <naeem.khademi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] =?utf-8?q?Comments_on_draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-01=3F?=
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:29:53 -0000

Hi all,

Reading section "12.4 Packet sizes and congestion notification", I'm wondering whether this should also apply to pure ack traffic?

EL

--
  
Emmanuel LOCHIN
Professeur ISAE
ISAE SUPAERO - Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace
10 avenue Edouard Belin - BP 54032 - 31055 TOULOUSE CEDEX 4 FRANCE - http://www.isae-supaero.fr
Tel +33 5 61 33 91 85 - Fax (+33) 5 61 33 83 30
Plan d'accès/Access map -  Page personnelle