Re: [aqm] BoF planning

[Wesley Eddy <[e-mail]>]

On 5/29/2013 12:39 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> On 05/29/13 12:22, Wesley Eddy allegedly wrote:
>> I was thinking 60 minutes, but it could easily expand to 90.
> 
> If it were 90 minutes you could expand on "brief summary/summaries of
> ongoing AQM algorithm work".  10 minutes is close to nothing, you can't
> get into the substantive issues.
> 

Yeah, if people want to do that, we should.  My thought was only that
for a BoF, we should be showing whether or not there are people who
will do the work, and that the details of the algorithms and how they
perform on test data sets might be too much.

By the way, so far I think we've only heard about CoDel and PIE being
written as I-Ds ... if there are other "next generation" AQMs that
people are working on, or existing algorithms that people think should
be progressed in this WG, we should definitely get those onto the
radar as well.

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems