[aqm] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: (with COMMENT)

["Alia Atlas" <[e-mail]>]

Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-03: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for a clear and well-written draft.

I would like to understand the reference of "Weighted Fair Queues" and
have
that clarified in the draft.  It's a technical concern, but I have
confidence that
the authors and ADs will address it.

1) Sec 2.2.3 refers to "Weighted Fair Queues" as well as "Calendar
Queues".
Perhaps it is due to a lack in my recent background - but what's
described is
nothing like Weighted Fair Queuing
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_fair_queueing).
Do you have a reference for "Weighted Fair Queues" or something else in
mind??