IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...

Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 12 November 2014 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CB81A1B8F for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:46:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4APCnplISLUT for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:46:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5EC1A1B54 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:46:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l15so2611670wiw.2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:46:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iBebnnzwxgXJmQlHBQumaYjUXrSRDMdEn5Tg3HVVKfQ=; b=upw23MOk8bNBAh+hPFzHxrYqSWHl8LJZ/K7Jau9G0jkDD+mslNGsdISleQvZEnmg+d FdH9Pv6mn3Thbmyz3iejLvL5ERwckx5wsMt0L6C2DYYGPlI04BNPvtnPN9cVSBG8OG9I TBe0mSAG/ckj0jgJ3KfMOHQ95F7TNv0eYkWO4CayRvFPrqf2pj6LHDJxeWetAh4LcACG 6ezpo+6oiZFmZxtiMHyQ1GIVB1V6NTa4MeafjXbo87pUYITf3bFWW8gHefuKTbOsv9YY Dmvviudv4YG4gT8VvE9i2ihr6Ed2nb1dWHs3xQK7dA/2ZkZRLAH5yZQav7uaeUOUUS50 8Rig==
X-Received: by 10.194.76.202 with SMTP id m10mr68631901wjw.42.1415836013603; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:46:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-9bef.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c03700152bc7017f2c6d34113.eduroam.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:152:bc70:17f2:c6d3:4113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dr5sm23491004wib.4.2014.11.12.15.46.51 for <aqm@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5463F169.6020805@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:46:49 -1000
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: aqm@ietf.org
References: <D086F727.B6AF%ropan@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D086F727.B6AF%ropan@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/s2JNDiHVUbfbD2Q7Yzevf6ihAl4
Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:46:57 -0000

[writing not as AD, but as random IETF participant]

Sorry for this blunt question:

Is there any other analysis made by an independent source, i.e., where 
not the PIE authors are running an analysis of PIE?

Thanks,

   Martin

Am 10.11.14 um 21:15 schrieb Rong Pan (ropan):
> Please see our analysis paper on PIE…
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rong
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email