IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] ACK Suppression

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Mon, 12 October 2015 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F581AC3A0 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upuNr7l8RfY3 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9791ABD3B for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbwr8 with SMTP id r8so226566lbw.2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Zn9Mu6lToxkW3qFs9HxfxfOFIeAbU0XYvXronLCM1oE=; b=zxicy7TFLqsjjglLCMA1GQc5HESxsyikb0MCmlIIxPiqn1eFDNdra86S/DjZXks1gP xcL2kB3IPNtOdMSaCnhf3X4HIhk9FjYe39yaH/gVs/EwLMROgvpFA45s9V2y+9yt1mNh UZweZ2p8jSvXkYmoWrrh5Qwcp34cXX4f4IMdcxKH9W+8MrZYp9pxkiP3apbcpy2CQ40D RXwKGbsHipP6uuSioD8TIYA3uWEaRXHcO/lnm7GbgCs/BGLnqdaGXgb+dY1wPYJkckyz cspDzBjO+kjrbNp6UT30QJGOw8xrLPShAJbTqCP4kOw93+Hc/ujdmxO6SRKGoGYWw+Js kx5w==
X-Received: by 10.25.22.146 with SMTP id 18mr8961426lfw.8.1444689601521; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (176-93-46-50.bb.dnainternet.fi. [176.93.46.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6sm3231839lbp.2.2015.10.12.15.39.59 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2418E41.54F49%g.white@cablelabs.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:39:56 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5F2CA872-E891-4E53-9D52-B347966D0A8E@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.1487.1444233956.7953.aqm@ietf.org> <1444247538.3556484@apps.rackspace.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510072200590.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> <1444251596.768725492@apps.rackspace.com> <CY1PR0301MB0649DB7A6DDE1840CCB0B485A8360@CY1PR0301MB0649.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAGD1bZbnCfv9GZKJ=ub6aijCbxq_3=1a+_A8WFXP3oGa6r=Lzg@mail.gmail.com> <D2418E41.54F49%g.white@cablelabs.com>
To: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/sjZqbvDbEs7MAjmCFM0FtiqpumA>
Cc: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>, "dpreed@reed.com" <dpreed@reed.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [aqm] ACK Suppression
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:40:04 -0000

> On 13 Oct, 2015, at 01:34, Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> wrote:
> 
> But, unfortunately for you, middleboxes have no idea (yet) of what QUIC ack packets look like, so they can't prioritize them.

If they are small, then at least some boxes will take that as a sufficient hint.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email