[aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem environments
Preethi Natarajan <preethi.cis@gmail.com> Tue, 23 April 2013 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <preethi.cis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3E621F93F0; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETKW3tGE5Uuh; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (mail-pd0-f176.google.com [209.85.192.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2A821F93BC; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id r11so728606pdi.35 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version:content-type; bh=QNNqlUyiAYOsnGsIG2N2yYsNodclqjO0irEm4ySC3M0=; b=G31yyQfIuUQ9W1byNONVdxpz2S8IfUEALDDlwBgtW6qgaqU7ZCD4S4avMhuS4J9/gX A716o4/xcZuPV2+qe0yZB0e1XLBe6qAn9eOJQGmITIenIteC2hE8o7ujaCQZCq8unSyV IQk9uT+/Rdw+DfWQjDDrzBIxSIsNLuWNwG9nTOt7/kbYB+mmX7iPqYZxjJkftNuOr2td 7gVr9le3VYIpj7ZPha24I75uMVqDc9P8QGN3EshdHS7ZP90SYZs669Y8mTdpzL5XxDxU ZL5IIQKL6xxmjisx42ywlMVTZzDtHZ2v5icw3b7vo5dT8B3YLeLVMdcfNb4zNnDKpJgQ vbfQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.204.98 with SMTP id kx2mr43837401pbc.26.1366759140983; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.33.22.215] (128-107-239-233.cisco.com. [128.107.239.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ew5sm386233pbc.9.2013.04.23.16.18.47 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:18:43 -0700
From: Preethi Natarajan <preethi.cis@gmail.com>
To: iccrg@irtf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, aqm@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CD9C64E3.31882%preethi.cis@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem environments
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="B_3449578729_28716767"
Cc: "Rong Pan (ropan)" <ropan@cisco.com>, "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" <versteb@cisco.com>, "Chiara Piglione (cpiglion)" <cpiglion@cisco.com>, "Mythili Suryanarayana Prabhu (mysuryan)" <mysuryan@cisco.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem environments
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:19:06 -0000
Hello, This is a follow-up to Greg White's (from Cable Labs) talk at the recent ICCRG meeting on PIE's performance in cable modem environments. Post the meeting, Greg was kind to share his ns-2 DOCSIS model with us. We investigated PIE's performance using this model. The key items from this investigation: 1. Bug in PIE code: The previous PIE release (that Greg used for evaluations) was missing a line of code. This missing line brings down drop probability under certain conditions and turns out to be critical for the cable modem scenario. Without this line of code, the drop probability remains high and takes longer to come down even when the queue delay has remained lower than the reference. The updated ns-2 PIE code can be found here ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/pie/. 2. Bug in ns-2 TCP/Linux: Greg's cable modem simulations used the TCP Cubic variant. We discovered a serious bug in ns-2 TCP/Linux Agent (confirmed by Dr. Injong Rhee's team) that makes TCP/Cubic senders very aggressive and unresponsive to packet drops/notifications, pretty much like UDP traffic. Please find more details about the bug here -- http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3608750&group_id=149743&atid =775392. We are working with Cable Labs to verify the cable modem results, they'll soon be available on our FTP site along with the PIE code. A technical paper about PIE was recently accepted at the IEEE Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing 2013. A copy of the paper is attached here. The Linux PIE implementation is expected to be ready by next week and we'll follow-up on that as well. Many thanks, Preethi on behalf of PIE team.
- Re: [aqm] [iccrg] Follow-up: PIE performance in c… John Leslie
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Greg White
- [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable modem e… Preethi Natarajan
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Preethi Natarajan
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… grenville armitage
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Greg White
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Preethi Natarajan
- Re: [aqm] Follow-up: PIE performance in cable mod… Preethi Natarajan