IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Thu, 13 November 2014 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38171A0084 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:19:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DK=1.009, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khS7TwicQQdB for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF421A0087 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:19:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1415837574; bh=/HwXJ0sdDuz1XFV9cyp7QFurw3pu7grqbMVSv16hj/I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=d3Ksw0vhLKf3UAbJHoY68Q0xYvkEHRuVA6P6U++E8fjuqx6RQeX/fQew19r9B8hLY h/MX8uQ9Cu0qrRaZIKod7kRF+KLjiRo+hXVojpd6hQHpnTgG+O4WzboakSaMYeGFMM oxEXCabB5VS+GSCW9DxkxbimpcIw/0fFwu3nFFiA=
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F4EB32138; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:19:20 -1000 (HST)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
References: <D086F727.B6AF%ropan@cisco.com> <5463F169.6020805@gmail.com> <cf344e47f30e4cd49afa04280b4cbeef@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:19:20 -1000
In-Reply-To: <cf344e47f30e4cd49afa04280b4cbeef@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com> (Richard Scheffenegger's message of "Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:03:44 +0000")
Message-ID: <87mw7w7y0n.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/wQMr2Zn8-ZohRFi4J597xABkIAc
Cc: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] analysis paper on PIE...
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:19:36 -0000

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> writes:

> I believe these papers may qualify that requirement:

I'll add to that the results I presented yesterday in ICCRG:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-iccrg-4.pdf


However, I don't believe there has been any *theoretical* analysis of
either algorithm apart from the one in the original PIE paper...

-Toke

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email