Re: [aqm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01.txt

Hi Fred,

Is there a preferred scheme for a self-tuning AQM?  I'm a bit out of
touch with the work in the area, but when I hear AQM, all think of
is RED (which is what most switches implement), but when I hear
self-tuning AQM, nothing comes to mind (and I'm not aware of anything
that's reasonably widely implemented or available).

I want to make sure I understand the requirements that this imposes
on switches and routers.

Thanks,
Anoop

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> FYI, I have posted an update version of the draft we discussed last month.
> One thing I would appreciate is comments from those who commented before;
> did my updates address your concerns?
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> > Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01.txt
> > Date: April 23, 2013 3:59:41 PM PDT
> > To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Fred Baker and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Filename:      draft-baker-aqm-recommendation
> > Revision:      01
> > Title:                 IETF Recommendations Regarding Active Queue
> Management
> > Creation date:         2013-04-23
> > Group:                 Individual Submission
> > Number of pages: 17
> > URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01.txt
> > Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation
> > Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01
> > Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-baker-aqm-recommendation-01
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This memo presents recommendations to the Internet community
> >   concerning measures to improve and preserve Internet performance.  It
> >   presents a strong recommendation for testing, standardization, and
> >   widespread deployment of active queue management in routers, to
> >   improve the performance of today's Internet.  It also urges a
> >   concerted effort of research, measurement, and ultimate deployment of
> >   router mechanisms to protect the Internet from flows that are not
> >   sufficiently responsive to congestion notification.
> >
> >   The note largely repeats the recommendations of RFC 2309, updated
> >   after fifteen years of experience and new research.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>