Re: [aqm] ARED evaluation for 1Gbps links

Naeem Khademi <naeem.khademi@gmail.com> Sun, 11 October 2015 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <naeem.khademi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9461B2EED for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4DZkyDyk99O for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC4E1B2EEC for <aqm@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbwr8 with SMTP id r8so125915542lbw.2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8KadHdOFAqTRMS79NQGIfCdNIMOpvpHclH9MLxFamO0=; b=GndQHco1mB+IemIPqVbUM7v4Lx38W6E9ZQJqlNvBfAkaLCJoRnhv8Q+JelfUrmVcUD HV7bDaG5T28pXFELiMKNVN2EdZxEzHRdmdmTZWbUnG0tNjzefjqZSTuhfd/51MbzwjlZ Zvu4HFSGVqGWaUKdFJWVhnYSyuhRxDvCqQedT9JLfqrcFbFsEX7QIvK/FVgSkcRFyISo LXmce8SMr8+qa71J2Oth9ycCy/Jner883338Yun+kvNYS77r2L1qB/yiD3sSmCL5cDL0 98NvrlK2R+W1T6KzRZa75dAb+Q2sxy/jPXJjrG/T5Lv6eC5SSmt9A25onQvXdUkP8kYf G7SA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.138.37 with SMTP id qn5mr11316734lbb.52.1444606769006; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.80.106 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <561A7A84.2070009@student.kit.edu>
References: <561A7A84.2070009@student.kit.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:39:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEjQQ5X7tf+2L8DjqoEQiCM8ddBD7JkYGnLvUF7g4wKdkp9RFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Naeem Khademi <naeem.khademi@gmail.com>
To: Polina Goltsman <polina.goltsman@student.kit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01160f564e8eb30521dcb9ac"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/yJqB3RxkHC3Ssvx55iJWJ6bTfOc>
Cc: AQM IETF list <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] ARED evaluation for 1Gbps links
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 23:39:32 -0000

would be hard to comment without knowing the config parameters.

Naeem

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Polina Goltsman <
polina.goltsman@student.kit.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have or know an evaluation of ARED  in 1Gbps or
> higher-capacity links.
>
> I am trying to determine whether I have an error in implementation or it
> really doesn't work.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Regards,
> Polina
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>