[aqm] WG status
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793EC129527 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yaDujOZxmNNy for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7141012953B for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id o4so32875176ywd.3 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q7nkoROmLy8vivCWhzp8oDHBL3o7wJX0oTamRbOc4JQ=; b=z3pS9p7CO1yNezGjgU+KjaToS5DxwaorbJFgTKJTay3Zw+VNR5CbBs6iKzGWm9Qmd2 Xo/T3k+OVdUmukWc41oi8Hs6oCvFVtDz+N4jJrkDUfa4ovIjaFUlQntBktHDsjQejHRM XAdKtKLuZPmIRE4lRl1Z705SuBjefnL8CCitxgGdmz2KoDee94+EtGGMfVSH1iMiaTz1 lGB0B0reDk6peqjepHGf16MSq3vC12pOC+dmILKjpXIhel51JWum09TOze34053gfyRj UoXvclpEaGF1hGF0ocMG8J0/hZQlT2C7Q08jrE9kvHZz6j93l33qigke7+5jWsA8WDDz 3Qgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q7nkoROmLy8vivCWhzp8oDHBL3o7wJX0oTamRbOc4JQ=; b=IuHE6l/zyPwZYRoihChDotqCqW8IMhhCjSFdxaDrsixtPLDQ/6bx3o6nQeLVnnf0GU fHJr09UvupQzhvcY0ShpKuHzdrH+Mgkb6dtyaNuO3vPzSXw02G+BEMPjLkCYMt5Z+Dty l/+cJeAK5J7jmX+MAq7y81heE3wxVCwWKWyz0X95m2cwOHKF+iBo3zXiS/RDi64O39+K 1Pd5PwMARLsVvBDQI5klWqAksDsm/3PKfXDW7WMTmzx1YjpD7BxkrVnkghRXpph7N+/W Dw2FbvFxPK70z+K68ADUTHK+n6EWOjof9/8ObQ6ZWvsqowdZMnh/CMAhU8cByw08YMuU 7c8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2MjMqg9SjT9HQuvZmOCq3L1+fWl1OhdR70g2qcoY4ITZgNiGilJmydY9b80CWY3Q==
X-Received: by 10.107.16.217 with SMTP id 86mr10243098ioq.228.1489674371454; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (cpe-76-188-215-129.neo.res.rr.com. [76.188.215.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n10sm1697431itg.8.2017.03.16.07.26.10 for <aqm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <9ca75fc4-c92c-fd92-fe53-d732189e2bec@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:26:06 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/ynVKnUifV34nKFRnVz15P8-KLNg>
Subject: [aqm] WG status
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:26:16 -0000
I think there are no surprises here, but as there is an IETF meeting coming up, I wanted to make sure the AQM WG status is clear. The final working group document (on CoDel) is now in IETF Last Call, on the main IETF list. AQM does not plan to meet in Chicago, and should be closed down as the CoDel draft becomes published. HOWEVER, the work on L4S and DualQ that has been discussed here is continuing in the TSVWG. People that are interested in this should definitely be joining the TSVWG list and discussing it there: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg TSVWG has agenda time planned in Chicago for L4S, so you may wish to participate there. For any additional or future work on AQM algorithms, implementation, etc., I think there will be several possible options that can apply depending on what the work is, including: ICCRG, TSVWG, AD-sponsoring, individual submissions, etc. As usual, ask the ADs when in doubt :)
- [aqm] WG status Wesley Eddy
- Re: [aqm] WG status Michael Welzl