IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] 2 suggestions from the IAB open meeting

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 16 March 2021 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEC13A1231 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=aFcESldH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QP5C0TS/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Km1yvE4u8zGD for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90AA3A122C for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5AFE46 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:55:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:55:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=qMVFEcPW+0hlA5hb0ua/sHBMsZVRZeq JbKmUjYq2qv4=; b=aFcESldHqYpxTnZ83rXrpOkPGyN3ExnCL3o3+eJBeFP+IjV uefLavHyLM4ng1r2fPJ2FgpfmSlSFMb1XEVhtKOh/8S1/iCVu9ZkUqNHyAXydsEU 8aHIPYZFsddEQR3h49jpygSTZgHQFlcNZHWl6M2KtlciIb0i+gK1PesQxe1EkLla hha8SKVvpX8hx7Dvonjku4+UQ1MPOWaFD1wMVYXmI3Nzs3XsCD+hl2KgnRFHhA1C TYx6Xad+wFdXlukjuQKWq7QOklcbFOI1TO8k94/UcJHJlkbdTskl6HOxdfi/QN5+ dW5FCPLg6sh9da1erdwfgPhyMgQR+ZgOF7CmxTA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=qMVFEc PW+0hlA5hb0ua/sHBMsZVRZeqJbKmUjYq2qv4=; b=QP5C0TS/BxQbsD3QlDVy8v py9KGUSaVPORHE7jfs6Yh1oyAu4TZqC4XXetACmWZHACDktcOZwnWJXzoVlIwaZl a/QwQ4mYh+fZlnH/SuP13e2zx016SvISOmMRsG9nDhbBAS+Uu2fatR0UX4UCXlFf VQSkUh2mXiHEUzhXyZCrckBO06WKJce3KL+nsNwjDFrDYcvQ5ETMTy/y/nfaXTNm E/ntARPoeZ+quPbQySU/m5a665nk+VrxEbWEOmhvjapbNYhPwd0+Ux7N47xzcoNi q6xLBdilGB7hA11YFX+Ip1eNbOJTgj1+RVHNs1maKFSgdvK72o5cOMiF4BlXGyPA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YjdRYPzJY89gTHhrYpeh0ICVyBi36eA8gSGJgqdw8RWdfz6zsis90Q> <xme:YjdRYHSEO_mI3sdWHgXQfW5EUQz_klusmvw8KycSXZE-R2xBbjNay_kFpiBfjizvd d5mC1id1C-jdqL6igA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeffecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtre ertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghn thhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekvefhke ffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeejgeffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YjdRYJX1p0HSLLdGn0FM4tpWrZC2ioYtsOwQu36LCsS2A7sy4LdaNg> <xmx:YjdRYJjaZru5OjGeB0IYkfgKgVzXyUG_xOBxbFV8TyS3lwhf0QD1OA> <xmx:YjdRYBBnk8OfgvEApjWJwIuWnpVU7E5HoVsVIahMPhffNMnogvxwgg> <xmx:YjdRYEP4DPipmVZgD_L2AquVySSriG6BlMaEn49WYvuc0nsGnS1pNg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 130874E00F5; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 18:55:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-206-g078a48fda5-fm-20210226.001-g078a48fd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <c529e751-b336-4745-ac47-88b4c555a270@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <25AAA9D8-F066-47C3-A19C-96D2DEEA33BC@kuehlewind.net>
References: <FB6B72D1-0E9B-4A05-BBB8-0A7F3FB123FE@cs.ucla.edu> <25AAA9D8-F066-47C3-A19C-96D2DEEA33BC@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:55:10 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/20mwHBp0_wPcs1pOW9GrKuGbL-4>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] 2 suggestions from the IAB open meeting
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 22:55:34 -0000

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, at 22:04, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> The IAB has been using the architecture-discuss list for announcements 
> about e.g. workshops, documents, or program for a quiet while and that 
> was in scope for the list already when the list was started. As you can 
> see the load is not extremely high. We discussed the use of that list 
> for these kind of announcements last year as well and concluded that 
> this list is a good opportunity to reach the community. 

Respectfully, I disagree.  It's not about load, but separation of interest groups.

If the topic is relevant for this list, as some of those topics you list might be, then CC for this list is appropriate.  When it comes to the IAB discharging their administrative responsibilities, a dedicated list would be preferable.

People subscribe to this list to discuss topics related to Internet architecture and while it might be convenient to use that to reach those people for other purposes, that's called spamming.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email