IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] [IAB] The IAB Liaison Oversight program - feedback on closing

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Wed, 24 February 2021 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863533A1357 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6HaW47QbrTa for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A593A3A1354 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id t5so2511362pjd.0 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:53:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pT9Va4wjixAiTyGLTVoGHGt6/kU5bhlckGlGR6ppVj4=; b=IkWG0b/vys435RVlyeidFLMqIyd3Vd2uC9/i39RVIgbws3c2vb+EbYAM3ha1JjBqsq bHzTXYtO648gEfo10iId694WlLeeC4GaxNhxVShPQivV8zyFMt9GV2qa/SxBvHoPKnfz fEmF8ZaI292OSHaXVAzKw4ZZCQuTElhh0of/89klE8ilQKxvqHOWJ4FBr50gZntr/kWe GnNAXTyZF/MpmmWPcuMrjPHkbzDTM905UD2EfVfnqfUqq2IMQONp0xaPH+51H1fWgfZ5 BAsykwfqgipohZ0HDKUGK7Na4mdw1wV4WGlnkyD+AO0LXRb7kTcjxfOwC+npP+CGLdt0 NKYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pT9Va4wjixAiTyGLTVoGHGt6/kU5bhlckGlGR6ppVj4=; b=UApWqEFXLL6kCtsINOmmi6FXgRHg78uji3igW5QwaMWrRpuXgPxHRIkWcoeuunPjo/ aZ4fV3wOqNG7+4kVPH5JIePzL26nFbhPcifLi2ITWLZ+IxcI4ZqkoUi9P5yTPiUIM8NR bfEHbQ7nnmRSttAVfDdS1ZVBJF8TIUm4ldNqUpWFTy4ycGWap53ASAWcZQ8XYuzncpBW JUWtA+t6YKZOin7lJB/MHgom7R8/QOsR1ZKpsXDcZ6uuigydfb6tJhXzOrx4zbyII2W4 bbTAiCXSrlzEOeCB8JsUYKsQW80AC05DSkamPvRUfwspD/ulw17qn2rQPSojET00tuDN tUPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PevBUblvlzXcSxsyakIkjWqRDOinZ39m8fjdHyqePRHj/vLeI CkbV6VeXSyaO1hiFJEHd3zIj9E2qO1kB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyY8F8d3XIfQsg0AcLQRLJ8LzPPxEdcAOm3l8OSjY4/e/1juA34MyS+86iGfFkFW7cSTafRwg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4acc:: with SMTP id mh12mr1805163pjb.10.1614131625724; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aspen.local (63-140-66-174.dynamic.lte.acsalaska.net. [63.140.66.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v26sm426691pff.195.2021.02.23.17.53.44 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:53:45 -0800 (PST)
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
References: <MWHPR02MB24649D2053322ED233429A05D6809@MWHPR02MB2464.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <313945B7-F998-410F-B067-004D95704C73@mnot.net> <ybl8s7ebcdn.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <28588344-bf77-825a-0c43-aa0d0c739460@nomountain.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:53:44 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ybl8s7ebcdn.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/2eOhvIJTBm-vFCZvqRtYb6I9CKI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [IAB] The IAB Liaison Oversight program - feedback on closing
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:53:48 -0000

On 2/23/21 2:19 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> It would be best, IMHO, to decide what *is* needed and then come up with
> a structure that works to support that.  

Well, right.  I'm unclear on why a decision was made to pull
the plug without more clarity about what needs to be done wrt
liaisons (other than the usual IAB IAB-ishness) but apparently
there's a problem here that could probably do with some community
input on how liaisons are or are not working in practice.  That
the program is dormant doesn't mean that there's no issue to
deal with, zeal for shutting things down (and I tend to share
that zeal in general) notwithstanding.

Melinda

-- 
Melinda Shore
melinda.shore@nomountain.net

Software longa, hardware brevis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email