Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6523A1299 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3SxRR_OUCpLO for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866853A1297 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id n16so3420699pgb.7 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jmM6vfYv5je/AINzEDAHEGhHB7O+G/QYk049F6DVByQ=; b=KnPa+ydk1TJgJjZ9pbx8hQ+yTBkScj1wLqHLdQsCd2J82UE3fBM14gr/p8opeqEYPl bke+m3WBTKPAxA1ikE4Ki8kdp7Q4kjmnGtQaG5EFGiuKT0MAPC/Am3E6PojzX2VjqqCh QM6+1MieYrPQPnm7vuTMArc5T4P3UubwzYUxbMVHdY0SF6DBdVx8d1VUECQZUqCUq4wR 7dga+UgSGj5Fpbp1FNpMufAVTnIYzqFM4DY/PFobPbcT+SZlKqEnNV4DZ2DWC8lSw2/9 VNt1LlNIKCb3I2irdfwcDAOXNIU8qOGZ2Ti2E2Dd9FOQmyWr8vy8ceMIyW7NOd3WauOe EJJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jmM6vfYv5je/AINzEDAHEGhHB7O+G/QYk049F6DVByQ=; b=HY/YCrN/A213oGtZhmZp0qK1HifjsUp/HQtwlwXqQXZhNPvsmESkWoZizVZLxgELBl H33zBZ0GWXPmlwBodI0pHOknhhKr7wxSLHkNIDZZNn8FZaSiNjqKmGGWwvEJCMQBhmz1 RvuQMFruYeJb8bc2RPmWmxs6gbYsgEkLaOcRmPsQVmx1Nu6kgXWGGqFSxlr0hySHzoLK XK0SixbegwmHVkLYY9aD7MY+PHTwo7Dt0RNUfb2SQL5G0+41MVlBN+0FQXQyjPjJYZu9 ZI06hYEGyuxb2a5XdJ31Uacl6TJIQDH2pMAt8wf20Io5IalL0VKYg6XeBlCjTgmmTgEW X3+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaDAmdUjMdkuYP4dY7hFpghe2T4v6R4xarf/J9lC5/mtXLLxk5y 7jj+SPPSpRNL+u4BXcDARAHQCSJK2U8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLDfieofHcccuvCt/86Qu/+sv9jwPQle1iMyPMjqdsfhOCwTN+UQAIQTwZwMQL7fgLkESBCLw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4a59:: with SMTP id j25mr695704pgl.336.1588278240427; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b73sm542439pfb.52.2020.04.30.13.23.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Ian Peter <ian.peter@ianpeter.com>
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <20200428190608.GN62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <d85b5fbc-0379-602d-7c9b-fabfd9cdac58@gmail.com> <20200428211737.GP62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <emde06c4fa-b2c1-418c-9f5d-50e5a28bbe6c@desktop-rub0n2r> <20200428222219.GQ62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <LO2P265MB0573C465963C5C75436952FEC2AA0@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <e514d4d8-10a0-b857-ed90-5c0c39b8dc16@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <728f9b75-382f-733c-d308-b5ba5101110b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 08:23:54 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e514d4d8-10a0-b857-ed90-5c0c39b8dc16@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/3lAx9iaRS_BvZYc9gz6niFs2okE>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:24:04 -0000

On 01-May-20 01:54, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> On 30/04/2020 14:49, Andrew Campling wrote:
>> In addition to the public mailing list that ISOC has subsequently
>> created
>> (https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion-papers/), is
>> there a suitable forum for discussion of the "New IP" proposal within
>> the IETF (noting from earlier debate that the Architecture-discuss
>> list is technically an IAB one)?
> I'm confused. Why does it matter if arch-d is an IAB list?
> 
> Seems to me that this is a reasonable list for discussion
> of Internet architecture.

As I have argued in my recent rant, the IETF (which of course appoints
the IAB members) is probably the best venue we have. And the IAB's
job description includes A for Architecture. So yes, as long as we
don't imagine ourselves to have any power of decision.

     Brian