IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience

Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com> Sun, 29 December 2019 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E438120090 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:51:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rad365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUnkoq6Kllx1 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr60041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.6.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E5912004E for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:51:14 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NGqVo7Y1CF52hzA1h+fmNcA74lSwjTXtgeMfv7FJbXBnUTsy8jfVgrm4sEApqGanM6WUAcLmak9pzpHxT2hdeWpiM27zncd/5078Qy22vaUT3hd9+8m0hhrcWMFqmckELnMSNG6E4NqHqXUUIMnRfHWoUE0m/LHpHQeFXi/Pstr+8AEsGxiQcWvtDR6hLGuBomBTovBbvzi5Ujxjt5lG2nqYmhST8SNAk/tyFebNWiT0nlgy69gWZqabr+9GqUnEiUXIdbR4h/qHXN7d2CTummBv+IaAlP1PzSnNdI7tg5HrMY7PfP3A38lc634kEpm31MF0mNVH534LH5PnJiZFIw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LdNmMqR88Jc9cq4FYShSW3aU1Y4D3Np9NXmoqDLL7vY=; b=j5tmhP/ohVTlFNywgHUuDkM/q/yiqyqrv4CB/KZkwFp35NayqAZtE1CQ/dB9IXqeRlfFJ1mBy49fhsVV1IM05CTNFShA9kdejKEG7fdpStZcX+TFzmwaY117xNUN9eqUYkdKBdJ+Q4jRHiv/z7jTjjhEtAhDkEzavugCJntdNRyLVWO+KnM4gOldX61MjavOeWkeumfHR8xZP4nHEVdaPRfe/bWkxFlL9u3qrtBgBhDqKKj8II1KbqW8w9qSlxGAsoBWv5yzlrs0kCUDzT8oE7YfeP4dMRTq6g3H4PNlmWlvzwbov+whv2LUFk28K2uFRJcPLEwMSGx76w27vu17kQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rad.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=rad.com; dkim=pass header.d=rad.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rad365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-rad365-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LdNmMqR88Jc9cq4FYShSW3aU1Y4D3Np9NXmoqDLL7vY=; b=cbf4QbXjUCogepqmGcohwwBaqkMyWagi5YVVaCTJ4bsV+ffoXotT9MWnpLLu72z5ksElLRMTC8lpIl8Q5UzIoqMOuCOlChXRjMCiCYgX5LKLMona7XCfUyy/x5s249hRmT9PxZ2a0cWNKgwo/PBMdG/LefSubW6xcAxDvIksGiw=
Received: from AM6PR03MB5046.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.178.89.202) by AM6PR03MB5798.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.123.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.11; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:51:11 +0000
Received: from AM6PR03MB5046.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad07:d39:5019:51a9]) by AM6PR03MB5046.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ad07:d39:5019:51a9%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2581.007; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:51:11 +0000
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf=40frobbit.se@dmarc.ietf.org>, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
CC: "architecture-discuss@iab.org" <architecture-discuss@iab.org>
Thread-Topic: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience
Thread-Index: AQHVucpaNl5YNG2lAUuXjudeP7YMxKfJAJuAgAAlMoCABV+2CIABaCCAgAACgACAAAccAIAAGsEAgAAsDICAAH3uAIAACOZQ
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:51:11 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR03MB504658B3CA5E05CCB0015861E5240@AM6PR03MB5046.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <f13e1588-35e0-2493-93d2-add3480bb207@cs.tcd.ie> <1127343564.5806.1577112317584@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <ebcca2be-6839-8f43-d74f-0e863e32cd2d@cs.tcd.ie> <2068147434.6516.1577178675917@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <LO2P265MB05733E4BD5A72EDEF96D3DE2C2290@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <6.2.5.6.2.20191227130815.120fc690@elandnews.com> <LO2P265MB0573E1B462A3804525BB2646C2250@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <2CA4CBDC-CAB0-4E02-BC4C-40DF67FB64BC@tony.li> <LO2P265MB05733F3BE310F2B6DAFDA54FC2250@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <304321FD-CB1A-45FE-B67D-0C8ABA6F0BF5@frobbit.se> <CAPv4CP9nZXREJDu9bauseQ5DWsCv9vioYsRLirp25uqx+n=Nzg@mail.gmail.com> <E95AE27C-005B-48CE-8B24-38F344902B7F@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <E95AE27C-005B-48CE-8B24-38F344902B7F@frobbit.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=yaakov_s@rad.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.166.71.122]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 15137fbd-02c6-4351-b9ec-08d78c33df73
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR03MB5798:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR03MB57980569481EC32A792676DDE5240@AM6PR03MB5798.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 0266491E90
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(39850400004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(52536014)(7696005)(76116006)(4326008)(55016002)(2906002)(316002)(110136005)(9686003)(5660300002)(8936002)(186003)(81156014)(81166006)(478600001)(8676002)(66446008)(64756008)(6506007)(4744005)(71200400001)(86362001)(26005)(66556008)(33656002)(66946007)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM6PR03MB5798; H:AM6PR03MB5046.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: rad.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: B32Sl2lTCJJgooYPSNcJ8YQgXkSxfWleoabL/tKSOXLEFFFMh+I4wFjOXLJbpnDMfuUkre8thLcyE2BFR2VeLCM6PtFickalxly6B7++vdRfQOwb+MU6kAC6LZ3cb4MVuSud7MIGLoMNDXxvt9YqX4hBhYwfny4UxTLHXXqiIDgCzHd2tlbpKTatYddbk+CiJga/DYBJosChFyQGe9xss2UqbYib8z2go/MCFKmVpOv+mT24hJjQEsRmda6291zA62QHFgysF2Cnzpoo7KGabTwEAzD4rsyng8jpZ5KaPzUo3g+KTI+0E4KHaj38gfvIDDqIg4aNzxNE/LXPeF6yn+Gn/xHFCrp4q+X/mzZ6TY5hHDvybA7ok+JN0fIUQOJNh2gMITdAoJLrXTMvGFomZ05tPfjfnsb2mleZ19xr32EfCFfzDXS5Mb1Bb87qDODK
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: rad.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 15137fbd-02c6-4351-b9ec-08d78c33df73
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Dec 2019 07:51:11.4709 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f9047108-cc2c-4e48-97a3-43fad1b3bf9d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: YrEHITsBc0Ws6WVe3E5p0ZRPjTHmCMjZQyHRj/VxbZq6zbRd6/kXDoq5YF7rToS4Efjr/a9cf1I9rA/0Vr0J+A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR03MB5798
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/4ZiL1_LpTMxr7pwSgsW40dy9RDo>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 07:51:17 -0000

Correct Scott, but I was more thinking of the fact ITU-T results might bind the members (the member States) by treaties, which implies the members do not have any choice but implement the outcomes. Just like ICANN outcomes are binding for the contracted parties in many cases.

No, almost all ITU-T results are called "Recommendations" because they are precisely that.
They do not bind members unless the member adopts them into its own national legislation.

Y(J)S

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email