Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Toerless,
At 04:08 PM 08-04-2020, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>If all you have is a liaison statement you will
>always wander on thin ice attempting to extrapolate
>the meaning between the lines / discussion.  Goes both ways.

There are liaisons who are expected to get the message across.  In 
theory, that should prevent the two sides from misunderstanding the 
(formal) statements.

>? Sorry, to much thread cutting... which suggestion ?

It was the one where you mentioned several SDOs and having them 
presenting what they do [1].

>As said in the othre thread, i don't think in an industry as
>mature as ours and as capital intensive, that there is
>a lot you can change short term and from a single player.
>Hence the need IMHO for IETF to have to rethink to promote
>and support more poactive longer term architiecture discussions.
>(and if you don't like the word architecture, use design, strategy,...)

I'll have to review past discussions (unrelated to this thread) to 
provide a good answer.  It may be possible [2] to make some short 
steps, e.g. have a venue for a discussion.  Someone will have to 
convince the IAB members to include that in their list of pet projects. :-)

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/D8Mxm3e4BPSf15JDXzfITNlwjbo/
2. I would rate the probability of success as very low.