Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sun, 01 March 2020 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F303A17E9; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:20:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gzzbdze9kbpf; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:20:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA45C3A17EB; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:20:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vtwIXcVn5MrWvPHXYni6honY/mm0V2aMH6OKiCiIc0w=; b=X+beVDqvcm+DIgK4XvfpD/PBd 9Vuswh3GptPPEE+QTEUqK/3+8LjYOz8L3VQuoVGIpP3++NJ6hlQ5dWDfCMBYXgCguYxrnevxQ4vvi nAixEYUEmwdYAnknmXJhzbNU3ZDCZZefl27/iVpudUgNjXBjY8pxIHwsG5s3YYNWihQrvjn6JuHQR e2ixd+iJeQy/IT/lgKhTT4gHTc6nX7dCY+eGoonncqqSIjqwi7Di73baLOmN92uJ3miSXB7bxEoD2 2M0ToDFRPwxwYcQ9tkozk6ZWWBdcyrFkSeK7pBwsOLN05vHyqNaRCxaNwUldKZGIysz4y2TP1GSM3 EIfzztIuw==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:64414 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1j8ED9-0041IK-Hc; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 21:20:11 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1AED863B-4C37-4B96-8B14-D8FC443318DB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <040673a8-0e63-6603-9fae-5fea164f4379@gont.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:19:55 -0800
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, architecture-discuss@iab.org, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
Message-Id: <9E2F7BA4-9439-4207-BA49-60E51634A4A7@strayalpha.com>
References: <876c9105-3da4-e614-2db0-bea025b54663@si6networks.com> <7749f91f-03f1-cc14-bae8-5fe68c88879f@si6networks.com> <CALx6S36wN7VEi_rxLC1ETcTvkGaPhs20KhQrGWAGGTrCL5OT+g@mail.gmail.com> <d41a94f5ede994b9e14605871f9f7140@strayalpha.com> <69bd06b8-7eee-dfbc-5476-bba0f71ae915@si6networks.com> <3c307da7e8f52b7a29037a1084daf254@strayalpha.com> <a24a3621-99f6-755d-c679-2061b9a67adf@si6networks.com> <CAOj+MMGJ11CBCov=-jfZUtROJPwhQB3A=+0gMBhzZgxoF_9N1A@mail.gmail.com> <A83D4788-AD7B-490C-B74E-2548A1345C47@strayalpha.com> <CAOj+MMHfKMGa7w9pkqg=2RC4XeuYk7+iHt949B3kUtc+vCeB1Q@mail.gmail.com> <E85CB286-E396-45AF-A7E3-5600B66297CD@strayalpha.com> <040673a8-0e63-6603-9fae-5fea164f4379@gont.com.ar>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - iab.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/CYjhFH5lEilgETWn9iRIMRSGORo>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 02:20:17 -0000


> On Feb 29, 2020, at 5:46 PM, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote:
> 
>> I did look at the protocols involved here; the ingress does add headers but doesn’t appear to handle fragmentation.
>> That’s a non-starter if you want your packets to traverse a network because people WILL hand you 1280-byte packets, so what will you do?
> 
> FWIW, we have been insisting on this point (and others) since they first tried to push EH insertion in draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header.
> 
> THey removed it from *that* document, but they keep trying to push similar ideas in other documents.

Well its seems simple to me - they need a plan for fragmentation or it’s simply a nonstarter because they can’t support 1280-B packets traversing the network.

No amount of “but this is what the user wants” translates to “they want their packets dropped silently”.

Joe