IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 08 April 2020 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58313A0DA7 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcHZYMxjcW7x for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BEF3A0DA6 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id B63AB28015E; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id AFBED280674; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82DF28015E; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D0B64C6C03; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 948203FD5F; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:42:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 07:42:04 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200408054204.GA6005@nic.fr>
References: <60a10451-5fbd-fcec-5389-7a72870dcc84@gmail.com> <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000017, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.11.5.63017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/DxsdXv73iIyZGfIVrnIKJK4aCkc>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 05:42:35 -0000

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 06:59:54AM +0200,
 Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote 
 a message of 11 lines which said:

> … and you can find one thoughtful piece of discussion from the IETF chair at the unlikely place of
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1677/

It seems that IETF's answer is about another project, by ITU. ITU and
ETSI have the same discourse
<https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/2017-2020/13/Documents/Internet_2030%20.pdf>
but, apparently, they operate separately.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email