Re: [arch-d] [I18n-discuss] Closing the list

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Wed, 13 May 2020 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA99C3A09CD; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49I6r8cGbulm; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE1833A0995; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C250EACB2594; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:37:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGPR0H_7Wadn; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:37:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AA22ACB2587; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:37:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net>
To: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net>, "Nico Williams" <nico@cryptonector.com>, art-ads@ietf.org, i18n-discuss@iab.org, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:37:12 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5683)
Message-ID: <829E56AD-C5A9-4796-88F6-331A99EAEC4F@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <E4905E6AFB8A7569858F82EE@PSB>
References: <0114D1C5-49AE-46C8-9AD9-AF30C9D13E91@puck.nether.net> <000A12D4443F2DC47E555650@PSB> <7D8E5CED-FAA5-423B-899C-EDD0D7ED970E@puck.nether.net> <20200513195459.GJ18021@localhost> <20200513201934.GB1417010@puck.nether.net> <E4905E6AFB8A7569858F82EE@PSB>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/E4h0yl0zhBupFVti1KpwVczlhZ8>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [I18n-discuss] Closing the list
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:37:55 -0000

On 13 May 2020, at 15:32, John C Klensin wrote:

> --On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 16:19 -0400 Jared Mauch
> <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>> 	I think the reason was a bit vague in my note, but the
>> criteria we used to review were:
>>
>> a) last activity of list
>> b) related to prior IAB workshops/activities
>> c) list was IAB sponsored
>>
>> 	We found many lists that were not used and this one fell
>> through the cracks in my steps to send out notes.  If the
>> community want it left open I personally don't think anyone
>> will object.
>
> Jared,
>
> Unless the IAB is specifically interested in the topic, if
> keeping it as an IAB-sponsored list requires that someone from
> the IAB actively monitor it and approve postings and/or
> memberships, my guess is that it is better turned into just
> another IETF non-WG list with the subscriber list moved over
> except for anyone who wants to opt out.  Personally, I'd prefer
> that the IAB were actively interested and I like the very low
> noise situation, but, as people keep reminding me, I had a pony
> many years ago and would like another one.
>
>   john

FWIW: I believe this list is actually just an alias on iab.org and 
already exists as i18n-discuss@ietf.org. If the IAB wants to simply 
ditch the alias and we update the notes on the non-WG list page, that 
would work too. But I don't care either way.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best