IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Mon, 29 June 2020 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1325A3A07D0 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P1UmGcNm9U8B for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9443A07E2 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id k6so13259227ili.6 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RbKSv36DybeZb2+tHGYfTtFgVASZQPo5nbJIQVnQFUI=; b=L7cv9F68x7hGxiUTnBB4k5tcLBSocYsmejqdH9GFCeFMgsZ8drdq36Y/iPyqLMjaKa IrTh+Pgx5xuMqSUnuRgOt3LQePGux/+9/1vHLhWoOt4PpQ0zyIx3f0MXi6TGgPY0hkwM GwzeLubshc7EwF2VGpySFWaw75sMJZ0X4JkpGgABddzgkEF0TFnoJD7Hj6c8rEBcqOli MhTqaHDY11uDuMFuUfMjNZb3r6RoWgWv3wyiE2Ji45A74bt8xThdlWgnoOD7aanoDED1 UN12Xb+TKltsooey7KnIhTQF9wVQal+SLH+4eTCpRwc8OSDJTLd7GRazdcU4jcJ1puQg +J6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RbKSv36DybeZb2+tHGYfTtFgVASZQPo5nbJIQVnQFUI=; b=jGN1E1H3pe8AgusiRjiTOjWDGkIayVzECDzP32zf2nvCpajtS12iA5Dg1oh9bQA/H7 OMnzR+puNJ5ve7AhYtrdkvLtkSTU8uzpQV/ZCalFIHIRBhQHhriRug+ddDYziMIAgTMX CvLAUOQSeMpH1gHJCFaHvlgCVJdKn0vYQVgtN4xYMwX70YXG7Hb95xGuvOEDs7QIm595 kw+Tq9SDmWJT/2VwCsHyByCH6NgE1c+23JjDVt/7QJJYvrHqS05IoDHeKLMrT7u+OGDT 0k2mncndNfYDGOjjXgxDfppF4+8E5lxNidPgXqSDHdaL3IiuZK7mKeKMTV8TiRZN2zGX cyIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XbfIvzttScDp+Q5uGMCzrI/+mRPbvRYXnkNYSTT7e1aHIkURX y6eFalxaiNS6aydBP2m0AhW3Sm5haoa/xpxI7y8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlqfQ5MI/zccLXIr7jfTREBP6wgzcqCw5rIhp385Q5d8F1nMRZu1UNyaFhQKTE+ZqkHHn7vqxisx1nmog4YWY=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:cf06:: with SMTP id c6mr14437221ilo.73.1593404134798; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SwT2MV-wg5ZA25_Z-iPReX6YZKzPUifBk+-G7js8iFgtw@mail.gmail.com> <9407069F-19E1-4AC1-BE4D-B7D6F62CC34F@vpnc.org> <CAChr6Swcn-y9UevzVB_TgTaPO4PU5Y_hXUBy6i=P9++3c18Vvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKi_AEvu4ESKogckHz12n_UQweMHiFuQVKKApi4+_Yy71wTGYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKi_AEvu4ESKogckHz12n_UQweMHiFuQVKKApi4+_Yy71wTGYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:15:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxfOUvsHsCb77aDdoR+FhbjOL_YSKaa=1eqeVZTKFROxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "architecture-discuss@iab.org" <architecture-discuss@iab.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000703c0605a9314f4e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/E9mqm09Hci_q3VgA2DBGlaT3BdI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 04:15:37 -0000

Amazing work, thank you!

thanks,
Rob

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:43 PM Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Rob &
> architecture-discuss,
>
>
> Adding a collection of references on "ETSI" having not been mentioned so
> far in this thread:
>
> (By the help of the search engine available at "liaison statements" for
> "ETSI":)
> Total Statements: 94
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/posted/?text=ETSI&source=&destination=&start_date=&end_date=
>
>
> Regard,
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>
> Pada Senin, 29 Juni 2020, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> menulis:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:14 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Although there are always layer 8 and 9 reasons for having, or not
>>> having, liaison agreements, ...
>>>
>>
>> Yes. This is the substance of my question.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>> PS - I used the word "reviewed", but I should have written "read and
>> commented", since no one asked me to do anything. :)
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email