Re: [arch-d] [I18n-discuss] Closing the list

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F6E3A090E; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uy1fnnHGaMPM; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DC33A0901; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1jYy3r-000PDn-VJ; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:33:03 -0400
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:32:57 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
cc: art-ads@ietf.org, i18n-discuss@iab.org, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <E4905E6AFB8A7569858F82EE@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <20200513201934.GB1417010@puck.nether.net>
References: <0114D1C5-49AE-46C8-9AD9-AF30C9D13E91@puck.nether.net> <000A12D4443F2DC47E555650@PSB> <7D8E5CED-FAA5-423B-899C-EDD0D7ED970E@puck.nether.net> <20200513195459.GJ18021@localhost> <20200513201934.GB1417010@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/EVxxuFQ6dIdgj5Pu5mqpKaQ9uJk>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [I18n-discuss] Closing the list
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:33:41 -0000


--On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 16:19 -0400 Jared Mauch
<jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:

> 	I think the reason was a bit vague in my note, but the
> criteria we used to review were:
> 
> a) last activity of list
> b) related to prior IAB workshops/activities
> c) list was IAB sponsored
> 
> 	We found many lists that were not used and this one fell
> through the cracks in my steps to send out notes.  If the
> community want it left open I personally don't think anyone
> will object.

Jared,

Unless the IAB is specifically interested in the topic, if
keeping it as an IAB-sponsored list requires that someone from
the IAB actively monitor it and approve postings and/or
memberships, my guess is that it is better turned into just
another IETF non-WG list with the subscriber list moved over
except for anyone who wants to opt out.  Personally, I'd prefer
that the IAB were actively interested and I like the very low
noise situation, but, as people keep reminding me, I had a pony
many years ago and would like another one.

  john