Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 20 May 2020 22:56 UTC

Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200520152717.0b1464e0@elandnews.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:54:05 -0700
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: iab-chair@iab.org
In-Reply-To: <yblh7wafnd5.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
References: <158920530782.23655.6622928751672901506@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512152625.124c1588@elandnews.com> <d798d383-9bab-50f8-b6ee-dabb9cc37c2a@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512162358.0b239160@elandnews.com> <4548adba-834c-bfdd-36af-66b367408df8@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512191150.0bafa9a0@elandnews.com> <9161f68e-f51b-f97b-fc2b-372d24404209@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512232644.0d9328c8@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKs9oLXBN_UVq=Mn5ZefvrSgPyrV1J=1NMA0=YVDRnJVA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513081326.0ababe28@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKG7+g7u4p92axbZx4AxhwZgNfgfeHhE708EVpLs+iJjQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513101502.0b0c7c90@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ++dWefRF5rbc0Fxp6wAFWJJH0rMt9u_5gv9BxN2adKbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513140922.0aebf148@elandnews.com> <ybld077uw6f.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513212345.0afe2f10@elandnews.com> <yblh7wafnd5.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/EbVztf5RULNgNMVB_KFZd8hWZAw>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports
Precedence: list

Hi Wes,
At 11:54 AM 20-05-2020, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>I think someone already answered you, but I don't see it in the response
>thread, so just to be absolutely certain your question doesn't go
>unanswered: the iab website did indeed have a bug wrt liason statements
>being listed in the menu and is now fixed.
>
>https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/

Thanks for making those liaison notes available.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Stephen Farrell
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Stephen Farrell
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Stephen Farrell
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Barry Leiba
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Barry Leiba
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Barry Leiba
[arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based Messa… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication,… Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Wes Hardaker
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Guntur Wiseno Putra
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Guntur Wiseno Putra
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Mirja Kuehlewind
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Bob Hinden
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Mirja Kuehlewind
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Alexandre Petrescu
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Wes Hardaker
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Wes Hardaker
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports S Moonesamy
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based M… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports Mirja Kuehlewind