Re: [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list?
Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 24 February 2021 09:23 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A2C3A1275 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:23:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koyRr7JT-aD6 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CAEC3A127A for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p200300dee71fe600049aa74dbdd16052.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:de:e71f:e600:49a:a74d:bdd1:6052]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1lEqNs-0002yN-F8; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:23:04 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <043101d70a8d$6d78d1a0$486a74e0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:23:00 +0100
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8A7A93A-4B23-4F27-8CB6-3B845D266183@kuehlewind.net>
References: <03b601d70a37$3e481770$bad84650$@olddog.co.uk> <F4D13869-3A60-4C81-B865-EB4E63933476@kuehlewind.net> <043101d70a8d$6d78d1a0$486a74e0$@olddog.co.uk>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1614158594;2c8f1daa;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1lEqNs-0002yN-F8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/Ebe2-oZ-2m8lB6WvChtA6KlnzJI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list?
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:23:16 -0000
Hi Adrian, Thanks for the pointer. I wasn’t aware that these pages were out of sync. We will update them! Mirja > On 24. Feb 2021, at 10:14, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > > Excuse me, Mirja, but... > >> You didn’t copy the whole description. There is one more part: > > I copied exactly and all of the words at the referenced link [1]. > If that page is not up-to-date, or if some material has been left out, then I'm not sure I'm to blame for missing it. > > I guess you're quoting from [2] or [3], which is a fine thing to do, but maybe the material needs to be synched to avoid confusion? > > Thanks, > Adrian > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/ > [2] https://www.iab.org/iab-mailing-lists/ > [3] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss > > > >> On 23. Feb 2021, at 23:57, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I notice that recently this list has been used to make announcements of IAB >> policy such as repurposing/scrapping IAB programs. >> >> It is good that the IAB is making those announcements and providing reasons >> (even if I don't agree with them :-) >> >> However, surely these announcements should be sent to ietf-announce@ietf.org >> so that they can be properly noticed by the community. (You wouldn't want to >> find that there was no interest in a sleepy program due to you not telling >> people about it!) >> >> This list is described as... >> The architecture-discuss list serves as a technical discussion forum for all >> members of the IETF community that are interested in larger architectural >> issues. It is meant to be an open discussion forum for all long and/or wide >> range architectural concerns related to the Internet Architecture. In >> particular, it may be used to discuss and bring forth different points of >> view on controversial architectural questions. Discussions that drill down >> and dwell on specifics of individual protocols or technologies are to be >> discouraged, redirected to appropriate other fora, or re-cast to discussions >> of broader implications for Internet architecture. [1] >> >> Or maybe this list needs to be repurposed? >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian >> >> [1] https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture-discuss mailing list >> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss >> > >
- Re: [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list? Brian E Carpenter
- [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list? Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list? Adrian Farrel
- Re: [arch-d] Rescoping of this mailing list? Mirja Kuehlewind